SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mrs.Justice T.V.Thamilselvi, J
Yasothai – Appellant
Versus
Kaliyaperumal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. R. Jayaprakash.
For the Respondents: Mr. Usha Ramman.

JUDGMENT :

The appellants 1 and 2 herein are the defendants in the suit in O.S.No.10 of 2014, on the file of Principal District cum Sessions Court at Ariyalur filed by 1st respondent/plaintiff claiming partition of his half share in the suit property. On hearing both sides, the trial court granted the relief as prayed for. Now, challenging the said findings, they have preferred this Appeal Suit.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are denoted as per the ranking in the suit.

3. Before the trial court, the suit was originally filed by plaintiff against the defendants 1 to 4. The 2nd defendant is his brother and 3rd and 4th defendants are the successors of second item of suit property. The plaintiff contended that the suit property is an ancestral property and the 2nd item situated on the north to south of ancestral property was enjoyed by their family for several decades treating it as joint family properties. After the demise of his father, plaintiff is having half share and his brother, 2nd defendant is having half share in the property. But, the 2nd defendant managed to get a patta in favour of his wife in respect of second item of suit property. Based on that, he has sold th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top