IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Ms Justice R.N.MANJULA
Gopal – Appellant
Versus
Shanthi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2011 made in A.S.No.62 of 2009 on the file of the Sub- Court, Ranipet reversing the judgment and decree dated 29.08.2008 made in O.S.No.83 of 2007 on the file of the Court of District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Arcot.
2. Heard Mr.A.Thiagarajan, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants and Mr.P.Mani, learned counsel for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record.
3. The fourth defendant has purchased the suit property from the first defendant. The plaintiff who is the daughter of the first defendant and the sister of the defendants 2 and 3 has filed a suit for partition and the same was dismissed by the Trial Court. On the First Appeal preferred by the plaintiff, the First Appellate Court allowed the First Appeal and reversed the judgment and decreed the suit and passed a preliminary decree by allotting 1/4 share to the plaintiff. Aggrieved over that, the first and fourth defendants have preferred this Second Appeal. The first defendant died during the pendency of this Appeal and his legal heirs are already on record as the plaintiff and the defendants 2 and 3.
4.
A daughter's entitlement to inherit a share as a co-parcener in ancestral property is upheld, emphasizing the need to distinguish between ancestral and self-acquired properties.
The court affirmed that items 1 and 2 of suit properties are ancestral, and items 3 to 11 are self-acquired, highlighting the plaintiffs' burden to prove family property claims.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that properties derived by the father through a partition deed are to be treated as his self-acquired properties, as per Section 8 of the Hindu Suc....
The court confirmed equal inheritance rights for siblings over self-acquired property despite claims of relinquishment without written evidence.
A legal heir is entitled to an equal share in joint family properties, and claims of exclusive ownership must be substantiated by evidence.
Unmarried daughters are recognized as coparceners in ancestral properties under the amended Hindu Succession Act, leading to equal rights in joint family assets.
Daughters have equal rights as coparceners in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act as amended in 2005, affecting share distribution in partition cases.
Daughters have the right to claim a share in ancestral property as coparceners under Sec. 6(1)(a) of the Hindu Succession Act, but their entitlement is limited by the proviso to Sec. 6(1) based on th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.