BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G. Jayachandran, Poornima, JJ.
Kalarani - Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Town South Police Station - Respondent
Crl. Appeal (MD) No. 225 of 2020
Decided On : 18-03-2025
JUDGMENT :
1. This criminal appeal is preferred by one Kalarani examined as PW1 in S.C.No.170 of 2015 on the file of the I-Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR), Thanjavur, aggrieved by the acquittal of the accused tried for the offence in connection with homicide death of one Mahadevan.
2. The appellant is the sister-in-law of the deceased Mahadevan. The investigation of the crime been set into motion on the complaint given by this appellant. The Thanjavur Town South Police registered a case in Crime No.43 of 2014 on 18.02.2014 at 14.00 hours for offence under Sections 147, 148, 120(b), 323, 324, 302, 506(ii) r/w 147 IPC and Section 3(1) of Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 as against 6 named accused and few others. Based on the final report, laid by the Investigating Officer, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions at Thanjavur as against 11 persons. Specific charges were framed against each of the accused and on their plea of not guilty, they were subjected for trial. To prove the charges 24 witnesses were examined by the prosecution. In support 21 Exhibits and 13 Material Objects were marked. The trial Court on cumulative assessment of the evidence placed before it, held that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt and acquitted all the accused.
3. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed on the ground that the trial Court failed to lay the evidence on the probability of the accused under proper perspective. Though the evidence of PW1 to PW5 is consistent and corroborative to each other with minor contradictions, which is natural in any case. The trial Court erred in disbelieving their evidence. Thereby the conclusion of the trial Court suffers perversity.
4. The substances of the prosecution case is that there was property dispute between the family members of the deceased and the family members of the accused who shared common ancestors. On 18.02.2014 at about 10.00 a.m in the disputed land, the descendants of Sengamalam namely, Ramalingam (A10) and Siva (A11) were fixing boundary stones for laying plots. That was objected by Mahalingam, Mahadevan, Ganesan (all brothers of Mahalingam) and Iyyappan. Infuriated by that, Ramalingam challenged Mahadevan and his brothers to be there and will come with his men and finish them all.
5. After this incident, members of both group have returned to their respective home. Mahadevan (deceased) went to the shop to buy medicine for his child. At about 11.00 a.m Ramalingam (A10), Siva (A11), Karthick (A1), Kumaran (A2), Rajam (A5), Subba (A4), Nagalakshmi (A6), Azagarasan (A9), Kumar (A8), Jeyanthi (A7) and Rajendiran (A3) all went to the house of Mahalingam ransacked his house and knowing that Mahadevan is not in the house, threatened his wives namely, Kavitha and Lalitha. Mahadevan who came to know about these incident hearing danger to his life and his family members, wanted to leave the village. Meanwhilethe gang lead by Ramalingam had attacked Iyyappan and Ganesan when they were about to give complaint to the police about the incident. The accused Karthick, Kumaran, Rajendiran, Suba, Rajam, Naglakshmi caught Mahadevan and Kumaran attacked Mahadevan with wooden log; Karthick attacked with knife; Rajendiran kicked him and also Suba, Rajam, Nagalakshmi stamped with their legs. Mahadevan died instantly on the spot. In this regard, a written complaint was given by Kalarani and received by the Sub Inspector of Police on 18.02.2014 at 14.00 hours. In the course of the investigation, the Investigating Officer found that A10-Ramalingam and A11-Siva alias Sivakumar instigated and conspired to commit the offence. Therefore, included them as A10 and A11 and also altered the charges and filed alteration report.
6. The Sessions Court framed the following charges:
6.1. Charge 1: For the offence under Section 120(b) IPC.
Karthick @ Karthikeyan (A1), Kumaran @ Muthukumaran (A2), Rajendiran (A3), Suba (A4), Ramalingam (A10), Siva @ Si


The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistencies in witness testimonies led to the acquittal of the accused.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, while minor contradictions in witness testimony should not undermine the core evidence substantiating the charges.
The prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt; insufficient and inconsistent evidence led to the acquittal of the accused.
The court upheld convictions for murder against the appellants, affirming that eyewitness testimony, supported by corroborative evidence, was reliable, and distinctions made in witnesses did not affe....
The judgment underscores the principle that an acquittal should not be overturned without compelling evidence, emphasizing the importance of consistent and reliable witness testimonies in criminal ca....
An acquittal in a criminal case may be upheld if the prosecution fails to provide reliable evidence and witnesses exhibit significant contradictions, maintaining the standard of proof beyond reasonab....
THE EVIDENCE OF EYEWITNESSES IS CREDIBLE AND INSPIRING CONFIDENCE. NON-SUPPORTING SUCH A VERSION BY INDEPENDENT WITNESSES WOULD BE NO GROUNDS, TO DISCARD THEIR TESTIMONY. THE PRESENCE OF PWS.1 AND 2 ....
The testimonial weight of an injured witness, corroborated by medical evidence and consistent eyewitness accounts, warrants conviction, overriding the trial court's acquittal.
The judgment underscores the principle that a conviction cannot be based solely on the testimony of a single witness unless it is wholly reliable and corroborated by other evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.