SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3146

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.D.S.Rajasekar, for Mr.K.Sivasubramanian
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Veerasekaran, Standing Counsel

The housing board cannot penalize the petitioner for delayed payments when it also delayed the completion of the construction, justifying the execution of the sale deed.

Headnote:(A) Writ Petition - Mandamus - The petitioner sought a mandamus for the execution and registration of a sale deed for an apartment after making payments as per the schedule, but the respondent board claimed delays in payments. The petitioner paid a total of Rs.35,06,400/- but faced delays due to construction issues. The court found that the housing board also delayed the completion of the flat, thus ruling that the petitioner was not at fault for the delayed payments. (Paras 2-12)

(B) Payment Schedule - The court emphasized that the payment schedule outlined in the advertisement was binding and that the petitioner’s delays were marginal compared to the housing board's delays in construction. (Paras 6, 10)

(C) Interest on Delayed Payments - The court ruled that the demand for interest on delayed payments by the housing board was unjustified due to their own delays in completing the construction. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was allotted an apartment and made payments as per the schedule, but delays occurred in payment due to the housing board's failure to complete construction on time.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the housing board to execute the sale deed within eight weeks, noting the delays were not solely the petitioner’s fault.

Issues: The main issues included the justification for delayed payments and the housing board's responsibility for construction delays.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that both parties had delays, but the housing board could not penalize the petitioner for their own failure to complete the construction on time.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of, directing the execution of the sale deed.

ORDER :

This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus directing the respondents to execute and register the sale deed in respect of the Apartment bearing No.M39, 7th floor, 60, MIG TNHB flats, Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was allotted above flat and thereafter, with no objection from the respondent board, the petitioner availed bank loan from the Indian Bank, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar branch. From thereon, the said bank has been releasing the amounts as per the stage of construction and the bank had released a sum of Rs.35,06,400/- as on 16.12.2017 considering the stage of construction and thereafter, the final installment was released on 05.10.2019 and the possession was also handed over on 26.11.2019. However, the respondents have not executed the sale deed and hence the Writ Petition.

3. The Writ Petition is resisted by the second respondent board. The transaction is admitted. However, it is stated that in the allotment letter itself, while 10% was paid upfront, the schedule for balance payment is categorically mentioned. The same is there in the advertisement inviting the application itself. That does not relate to the stage of construction and they have to pay the appropriate percentage of costs on the relevant dates. Accordingly, while the petitioner made the first two payments i.e., the initial upfront payment of 10% within the due dates, thereafter, the next 20% of the cost was paid with a delay of more than 40 days. The second transaction of 20% was paid with a delay of three days. Thereafter, the further 10% of the cost, that had to be paid on 30.11.2016, the further 10% on 28.02.2017, the further 10% on 31.05.2017, the further 50% on 31.08.2017 were all not paid and when the further 5% became due on 30.11.2017, in all amounting to 40%, the entire amount was paid in one lumpsum only on 16.12.2017, amounting to Rs.35,06,400/-. Therefore, the same was made with a delay. The final 10% amount was also to be paid at the rate of 5% each on 28.02.2018 and 31.05.2018. However, it was belatedly paid in one lumpsum on 05.10.2019. Therefore, the interest, at the applicable rate, has to be paid for the belated payment. Therefore, as per the calculation that is made, as on 13.05.2024, the petitioner has to pay another balance outstanding of Rs.5,17,332/- with subsequent interest. If the petitioner pays the entire interest amount, which is upto the interest till date, the first respondent board will immediately execute the sale deed.

4. Heard Mr.D.S.Rajasekar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.D.Veerasekaran, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent board, who reiterated the respective contentions.

5. I have considered the same and perused the material records of the case.

6. It is essential to quote the relevant payment schedule as per the advertisement which reads as follows:-

"Balance 90% payment to be remitted as detailed below:

1) 20% of cost of the flat, on commencement of work.

2) 20% of cost of the flat with in next 3 months.

3) 10% of cost of the flat with in next 3 months.

4) 10% of cost of the flat with in next 3 months.

5) 10% of cost of the flat with in next 3 months.

6) 5% of cost of the flat with in next 3 months.

7) 5% of cost of the flat with in next 3 months.

8) 5% of cost of the flat with in next 3 months.

9) 5% of cost of the flat will be collected at the time of handing over."

Therefore, it is true that the payment of the installments was not made depending upon the stage of construction. Therefore, the agreement that is made by the petitioner, along with his bank, or the norms of the bank will not bind the respondent board and they will bound by the advertisement.

7. As a matter of fact, the payments that are made with the amount due and the delayed time etc., are all tabulated by the respondent board in paragraph No.4 of the counter-affidavit and the tabular column is extracted hereunder:-

S.No.Payment to be made as per schedule mentioned in Regular allotment or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top