IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. Justice A.D. Maria Clete, J
Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund, Represented by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
Coimbatore North Sarvodaya Sangh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.D. Maria Clete, J.
Heard.
2. All these writ petitions have been filed by the Employees Provident Fund Department, challenging various orders passed by the Employees Provident Fund Tribunal, Delhi, which granted relief to the Respondents and interfered with the orders issued by the authorities under Section 7A of the EPF Act. Notably, there has been an inordinate delay in filing these writ petitions, as illustrated in the table below:
| SI. No. | Writ Petition Number | Date of Tribunal’s order | Years of delay |
| 1 | W.P.No.1242/2020 | 070411 | 9 years |
| 2 | W.P.No.10704/2020 | 111814 | 6 years |
| 3 | W.P.No.11138/2020 | 111814 | 6 years |
| 4 | W.P.No.11712/2020 | 090414 | 6 years |
| 5 | W.P.No.11714/2020 | 090414 | 6 years |
| 6 | W.P.No.12577/2020 | 080513 | 7 years |
| 7 | W.P.No.16622/2020 | 121212 | 8 years |
| 8 | W.P.No.16623/2020 | 081914 | 6 years |
| 9 | W.P.No.16767/2020 | 101614 | 6 years |
3. Although the duration of delay varies, the deponent of the affidavit, namely the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Coimbatore, has provided a standardized explanation for the delay in all affidavits. In W.P. No. 12577 of 2020, he stated in Paragraph 12 as follows:
“It is submitted that the documents were handed over to the earlier panel counsel for the petitioner. Due to ill health, he did not file th
Office of the Chief Post Master & Ors. vs. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr.
P.S. Sadasivaswamy v. State of Tamil Nadu
Unexplained delays in filing writ petitions lead to dismissal, emphasizing the need for government departments to act diligently and provide reasonable justifications for delays.
The terrain allowance is not included in 'basic wages' as defined by the EPF Act due to its inconsistency among employees; thus, it is exempt from EPF contributions.
The court established that inordinate delay in seeking legal remedy, especially in service-related claims, can bar relief, and that the doctrine of delay and laches is a critical consideration in the....
Jurisdictional limitations must be strictly observed, as appellate tribunals cannot entertain appeals filed beyond statutory time limits, reinforcing the necessity for procedural compliance in civil ....
The Appellate Tribunal acted without jurisdiction by entertaining an appeal barred by limitation, and mens rea is not required for civil liabilities.
The Court's discretion to refuse jurisdiction due to delay and laches in filing a writ petition, and the limitations on the Court's adjudication of unchallenged actions of the public authority under ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.