SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
M/s. Global Closures, Rep. by its Partner Thiru. V. Ponnusamy - Petitioner 
Versus 
The State Tax Officer-2, Survey Unit, State Intelligence Wing, Coimbatore Division, Commercial Taxes Complex, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore and Ors. – Respondents
W.P. No.8284 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos.9285 & 9286 of 2025
Decided On : 12-03-2025


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M. Hariharan
For the Respondents: Mr. C. Harsha Raj, Special Government Pleader (T).

The amendment to Section 16(5) of the CGST Act allows registered persons to claim input tax credit for specified financial years despite initial limitations.

Headnote:(A) Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 16(4) and Section 16(5) - Writ Petition challenging the order reversing input tax credit (ITC) claims due to late filing of GSTR-3B returns - Court quashed the impugned orders, allowing ITC claims within the extended deadline of 30.11.2021 as per the amended provisions. (Paras 10-12)

(B) Limitation - The court held that the petitioners are entitled to avail ITC despite the initial limitation period, as the amendment to Section 16(5) allows for claims pertaining to earlier financial years. (Paras 10.1-10.2)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, registered dealers, faced challenges in filing GSTR-3B returns due to financial constraints and other issues during the COVID-19 lockdown, leading to the reversal of their ITC claims by the respondent-Department.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the impugned orders were unsustainable due to the amendment in the CGST Act allowing ITC claims within the new deadline.

Issues: The main issues were the validity of the reversal of ITC claims based on late filing and the applicability of the amended provisions of the CGST Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the amendment to Section 16(5) allows registered persons to claim ITC for specified financial years, overriding the limitation in Section 16(4).

Result: Writ Petitions allowed.

Order :

(KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.)

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Special Government Pleader (T) on behalf of the respondents.

2. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 03.12.2024 passed by the first respondent and to quash the same and for a further direction to the 1st respondent to refund tax at Rs.1,09,75,276/- which was collected at the time of inspection.

3. When this Writ Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Special Government Pleader(T) counsel for the respondents, would submit that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition, has been squarely covered by the common order of this Court, dated 17.10.2024 passed in W.P.Nos.25081 of 2023, etc., batch, wherein, this Court has categorically held in paragraphs 9 to 12 as under:

“9. The petitioners in all these Writ Petitions are registered dealers on the files of the respondent- Department under the provisions of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017/CGST Act 2017. Though the petitioners have filed GSTR-1 returns in time, however, insofar as claim of ITC is concerned, since the petitioners were faced with certain difficulties, such as Financial constraints (as there was complete lock down due to outbreak Covid-19) health related ailments, fire accidents, they were unable to file GSTR-3B returns, which prompted them not raising their claim ITC in time before the prescribed date. Whereas, the respondent-Department without considering such vital aspects and that reasons for the delay is not deliberate, issued the show cause notices to the petitioners, proposing to reverse the ITC availed and went to the extreme level of confirming the proposals contained in the show cause notices by passing the impugned orders,whereby, the claim made by the petitioners for ITC was reversed and the petitioners have been directed to tax/penalty/interest. Aggrieved against the impugned orders, the petitioners are before this Court by way of present Writ Petitions seeking for setting aside the impugned orders.

10. After the filing of these Writ Petitions, certain development took place, i.e. that 53rd GST Council Meeting was held on 22.06.2024, and during the said Meeting, the GST Council recommended for extension of the deadline for availing ITC on any invoice or debit note under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act and this extension would be applicable to any GSTR-3B returns filed for the Fys 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 with a new deadline deemed to be as ''30.11.2021'', to which, the Presidential Assent was also obtained by the Government of India on 16.08.2024, whereby, the financial proposals of the Central Government for the Financial Year 2024-25 was given effect to vide Finance Act, (No.2) of 2024, and in view of the aforesaid enactment, the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, issued a Notification, bearing No.17 of 2024-Central Tax, dated 27.09.2024, pursuant to which, a Circular No.237/31/2024-GST was issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, which was addressed to all the Principal Chief Commissioners /Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners/Commissioners of Central Tax (All), thereby, clarifying the issues regarding implementation of provision of sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) in Section 16 of CGST Act, 2017, the impugned orders are no longer sustainable and liable to be quashed. In this context, it would be apposite to refer to both Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, as well as amendment made to Section 16 (4) by interpolations of sub-sections 16 (5) and (6), and by insertion of sub-section (5) to Section 16, which are extracted herein under:-

Section 16 (4)

''A registered person shall not be entitled to take input tax credit in respect of any invoice or debit note for supply of goods or services or both after the thirtieth day of November following the end of financial year to which such invoice or debit note per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top