G. ARUL MURUGAN
Kalaiselvi – Appellant
Versus
Govindaraju – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.42 of 2010 dated 08.03.2012 on the file of Court of Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.190 of 2004 dated 29.03.2010 on the file of the Court of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kattumannarkoil.
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.17 of 2011 dated 08.03.2012 on the file of Court of Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram modifying the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.140 of 2004 dated 29.03.2010 on the file of the Court of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kattumannarkoil.)
1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.190 of 2004, who had filed a suit for specific performance and 1st defendant in O.S.No.140 of 2004, who had filed a suit for bare injunction is before this court, as Appellant in both Second Appeals. The sole defendant in the suit for specific performance, the plaintiff in the suit for bare injunction is the 1st respondent in both Second Appeals.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.