SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3403

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
S. Sasitharan - Appellant 
Versus 
The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore District - Respondent 
W.P.No.5901 of 2025
Decided on : 20-02-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.R.Chakkaravarthy
For the Respondent:Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Customary celebrations should not be hindered without substantial justification, and authorities must respond promptly to requests for cultural events.

Headnote:(A) Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus - Permission to conduct cultural program - The petitioner sought permission to conduct a dance and music program at a temple festival, which was denied by the authorities citing potential law and order issues - The court emphasized the importance of customary celebrations and previous rulings allowing such events - The impugned order was quashed, and permission was granted with specific conditions. (Paras 1, 8, 10)

(B) Law and Order - The court reiterated that customary celebrations should not be hindered without substantial justification, and police should act promptly on requests for such events. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition after the second respondent denied permission for a cultural program at a temple festival, citing law and order concerns despite historical precedents allowing such events.

Findings of Court:
The court found the denial of permission unjustified and quashed the impugned order, directing the respondents to grant permission with conditions to ensure public order.

Issues: The main issues included the justification for denying permission based on law and order and the adherence to customary practices in temple celebrations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that customary celebrations should be upheld unless there is clear evidence of potential disruption, emphasizing the need for timely responses from authorities to requests for such events.

Result: Writ Petition allowed with directions.

Table of Content
1. counsel argues for permission (Para 2 , 3)
2. government advocate argues against (Para 4)
3. court reviews previous orders (Para 5)
4. court cites previous rulings (Para 6 , 7)
5. impugned order quashed (Para 8 , 9 , 10)

ORDER :

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order made in Na.Ka.No.10/Ka.Thu.Ka.Pa/2025, dated 16.02.2025 passed by the second respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant permission and protection to conduct cultural program (Dance and Music Program) in Arulmigu Sri Mariamman Aalayam situated at Muthandikuppam Village, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District scheduled to be held on 24.02.2025 from 6.00 p.m to 10.30 p.m.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a temple namely, Arulmigu Sri Mariamman Aalayam situated at Muthandikuppam Village, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District, for the past several decades, the villagers and the neighbouring villagers used to celebrate the festival in a grandeur manner every year. Accordingly, the villagers have decided to celebrate the Arulmigu Sri Mariamman Aalayam temple festival for this year by collecting funds from the public of the said villagers. The said festival was scheduled to be conducted on 24.02.2025. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation to the second respondent, seeking permission and protection to conduct cultural program in Arulmigu Sri Mariamman Aalayam on 24.02.2025. The second respondent, without considering the above circumstances, mechanically rejected permission to conduct dance and music programme for the reason that if they conduct dance and music programme, there will be a law and order problem.Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court repeatedly directs the police officials to grant permission to conduct Aadal Padal programme and other related programmes with certain conditions. Therefore, he prayed to quash the impugned order and prayed to grant permission to conduct Aadal padal programme on 24.02.2025.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents submits that if the petitioner is allowed to conduct Aadal Padal programme, there will be a law and order problem. Therefore, this criminal original petition is liable to be dismissed.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

6. It is relevant to rely the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court dated 10.07.2018 made in W.P.(MD)No.14491 of 2018, where, this Court has held as follows:

“3. ....... In M.Velmurugan V. The Superintendent of Police , on 24.01.2018. In passing orders in W.P.(MD) No.13440 of 2017, dated 20.07.2017, this Court had observed as follows:-

“3.We may at the very outset note that the celebrations pertain to Arulmighu Sankaranarayana Swamy Temple, Sankarankovil. It is a very ancient and renowed Temple. It is under the control of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department. It is beyond dispute that celebrations in such Temples are customary in nature. It is not as if the writ petitioner is seeking to introduce some new practice. What is being traditionally held and conducted has to be necessarily followed. Therefore, we have no hesitation in allowing the writ petition as prayed for”

It is also relevant to note the notification dated 10.08.2017 in S.O.2555(E) by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, wherein, it has been stated as follows:-

“3.In the principal rules, in rule 5, for sub-rule (3), the following shall be substituted namely:-

(3)Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule(2), the State Government may subject to such terms and conditions as are necessary to reduce noise pollution, permit use of loud speakers or public address systems and the like during night hours (between 10.00 p.m. to 12.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top