SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3433

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
Gurucharan Sivaraj - Appellant 
Versus 
The Director General of Police, Government of Tamil Nadu - Respondent 
W.P.No.3727 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.4112 of 2025
Decided on : 21-02-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Abdukumar Rajarathinam, Senior Counsel
For the Respondents: Mr.K.M.D. Muhilan

Jurisdiction for investigation extends to areas where crime consequences manifest, allowing local police to act despite part of the crime occurring outside their territory.

Headnote:(A) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 7 and 8 - Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 67A - Jurisdiction of police in Zero FIR - The court directed the third respondent to complete the investigation in Zero FIR No.1 of 2025, affirming that part of the crime occurred within its jurisdiction due to messages sent to victims' contacts in Ooty. (Paras 2, 3, 4, 5)

(B) Jurisdiction - The court held that even if part of the crime occurred outside the jurisdiction, the local police could investigate due to consequences arising within its territory. (Paras 3.1, 4.1)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, father of a minor victim, sought direction for investigation into sexual assault and harassment by the victim's grandfather during her stay at his home, where he also shared morphed images of her.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the third respondent has jurisdiction to investigate the case, as part of the crime occurred in its area.

Issues: The main issues were the jurisdiction of the local police to investigate crimes partly occurring outside their area and the necessity to complete the investigation promptly.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that jurisdiction can extend to areas where the consequences of the crime manifest, affirming that the local police are competent to investigate.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of with directions.

ORDER :

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the third respondent to comply with the orders dated 10.01.2025 and 21.01.2025, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram, Nilgiris, thereby, directing to complete the investigation in Zero FIR No.1 of 2025, dated 06.01.205 and file a charge sheet within the time frame fixed by this Court.

2.The petitioner is the father of the minor victim girl. The victim is studying 9th standard in a boarding school at Ooty. The accused 1 & 2 are maternal grandfather and aunt of the victim girl. The victim girl used to spend her Winter holidays at her grandfather and aunt's house at Bangalore and the same continued even after the demise of her mother. On 04.12.2024, the petitioner and the victim girl went to her grandfather's house to spend her Winter holidays. After completion of her holidays, on 09.12.2024, she returned to Ooty. While she was with her grandfather, he threatened the victim girl and took her phone and transferred all her personal photos to his phone without her permission and abused her physically and verbally. Further, he also threatened her with dire consequences. While she was staying with her grandfather, on 02.01.2025, when the victim girl was sleeping with her grandmother, her grandfather went to their room and he misbehaved with her. He also sexually assaulted her. However, the victim did not tell to her grandmother as she was in a state of shock. Thereafter, her aunt attempted to take her finger prints. When the victim refused to do so, her grandfather dragged her down the staircase by pulling her hair and pushed her to the sofa and had beaten her. When the petitioner went to Bangalore to pick up her, he was not allowed to go inside the house and as such, the petitioner called the local police and they came to rescue the victim from her grandfather. Immediately, she was taken to Skanda Health Care at Bangalore and she was treated for her injuries sustained on her Nose. Thereafter, they came to Ooty on 04.01.2025.

2.1.The petitioner received a phone call from the relatives and friends informing that the victim's grandfather had shared the personal photographs of the victim girl along with screenshots of Whatsapp and abusing the victim and tarnishing her image by morphing her photo with nude photographs. Therefore, a complaint was lodged and on receipt of the same, the third respondent registered a Zero FIR in Zero FIR No.1 of 2025 as against the victim's grandfather and aunt for the offences under Sections 7 & 8 of the POCSO Act, Section 115 (2) of the BNS Act and Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

2.2.Pursuant to the registration of the FIR, the accused moved application seeking anticipatory bail before the learned Session Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram, Nilgiris. The learned Session Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram, Nilgiris, passed an interim order, thereby directing the third respondent not to arrest the accused on appearance on condition to deposit for a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- jointly on or before 21.01.2025. Further, directed the third respondent to complete the investigation expeditiously and file a final report and imposed a condition that the accused shall not leave Ooty until further orders. On 21.01.2025, when the counsel for the victim appeared and produced medical records of the physical abuse made by the accused and also produced the photographs, which were allegedly the accused had sent it to the victim's friends, relatives and her classmates, the Trial Court directed the third respondent to conduct investigation and file a preliminary report with the aid of the Cyber Crime Division of Ooty on 27.01.2025. However, no preliminary report was filed by the third respondent on 27.01.2025 and they filed a report stating that they have no jurisdiction to conduct the investigation since the entire occurrence had taken place at Bangalore. The learned Session Judge, Magalir Neethi Mandram, Nilgiris, dismissed the anticipatory bail pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top