SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3525

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, J.
P. Veera Muthur Petitioner 
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Principal Secretary to Government Higher Education Department Secretariat and Ors. – Respondents
W.P. Nos.5860 & 5165 of 2025 And W.M.P. No. 6444 of 2025
Decided On : 27-02-2025 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Dr. K. Kannan, Ms. N.Lavanya for E.C.Ramesh.
For the Respondents: Mr. D.Ravichandran, Special Government Pleader, Mr. K. Sathish Kumar, Standing Counsel, Mr. M. Nallathambi.

The court upheld the age limit for Assistant Professor positions, emphasizing adherence to established recruitment guidelines and the prohibition against arbitrary changes mid-process.

Headnote:(A) G.O.Ms.No. 233, Law (LS) Department, dated 11.04.2022 - Notification No.01/2025 dated 24.01.2025 - Age criteria for Assistant Professor posts - Petitioners challenged age limit of 40 years for eligibility, seeking relaxation based on prior teaching experience. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Recruitment Process - Court emphasized adherence to established guidelines and the importance of not altering eligibility criteria mid-process, referencing Supreme Court's ruling on recruitment rules. (Paras 15-16)

(C) Judicial Discipline - Court noted that it cannot issue directions contrary to prior judgments, maintaining the integrity of the recruitment process. (Paras 11-12)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners aged 45 and 50 sought to apply for Assistant Professor positions but were barred due to age limit set by the Teacher Recruitment Board. (Paras 2-4)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the age limit of 40 years with a maximum extension of 5 years for teaching experience, emphasizing adherence to existing rules. (Paras 10-20)

Issues: The primary issue was whether the age criteria could be relaxed for the petitioners based on their teaching experience. (Paras 3-4)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that relaxing the age limit would lead to arbitrariness and undermine the established recruitment process, which is bound by prior judicial directions. (Paras 20-21)

Result: Writ Petitions dismissed.

ORDER :

(C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, J.)

Originally the Writ Petitions have been filed seeking a Mandamus and seeking direction against the respondents to relax the Government order in G.O.Ms.No. 233, Law (LS) Department, dated 11.04.2022 and consequently also relax the age criteria in the Notification No.01/2025 dated 24.01.2025 in so far as the posts of Assistant Professor (Law) and Assistant Professor (Pre-Law).

2. The writ petitioner in W.P.No. 5165 of 2025 R.Ghunasekaran, is aged about 45 years as seen from the affidavit filed by him. The writ petitioner in W.P.No. 5860 of 2025 P.Veera Muthu is aged 50 years as seen from the affidavit filed by him. They had both intended to apply for the post of Assistant Professor (Pre-Law) consequent to the notification issued by the Teacher Recruitment Board dated 24.01.2025. They are both otherwise eligible to be considered for the appointment so far as their educational qualification is concerned.

3. The only issue raised in these Writ Petition is with respect to the criteria relating to the age within which the candidate could be considered eligible to apply for the said post. Under the notification dated 24.01.2025, the Teacher Recruitment Board stipulated the age as on 01.07.2025. It had been contended that no person shall be eligible for appointment by direct recruitment to the post of Assistant Professor and Assistant Professor (Pre- Law), if he / she had completed the age of 40 years as on 01.07.2025. It had also been further provided that for the appointment to the post of Assistant Professor, for each year of service, whether regular or temporary, in any of the teaching course in a law college in the State, the age limit will be increased by one year subject to a maximum for five years.

4. The only interpretation that could be given to this particular stipulation is that as on 01.07.2025, the candidate who aspires to apply to the post of Assistant Professor (Law) and Assistant Professor (Pre-Law) should not have crossed the age of 40 years. But however, if the said candidate had served in a teaching profession either on regular basis or on part time basis which could also include a Guest Lecturer, then one year weightage is given for each year of such service rendered as Lecturer either full time or part time. But that would be subject to a maximum of 5 years. This would automatically increase the eligible age criteria to 45 years to those, who had put in 5 years of service as part time or full time as teacher in law in any Law College within the State.

5. This particular guideline relating to the age flows from G.O.Ms.No. 233, Law (LS) Department, dated 11.04.2022. That particular Government Order had been passed consequent to orders of a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.Nos. 19534 of 2018 batch and RA No. 195 of 2019 in W.A.No. 533 of 2018. In the aforementioned Writ Petition/ Writ Appeal, the Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 19.08.2021 had examined the conditions which are required to be stipulated for the post of Assistant Professor (Pre-Law) course in Government Law Colleges in the State of Tamilnadu. It had been stated that consequent to the directions issued by the Division Bench and in conformity with those guidelines, G.O.Ms.No. 233, Law (LS) Department, dated 11.04.2022 had been passed by the Government. It is to be noted that this particular Government Order is not put to challenge by the writ petitioners herein.

6. In the said Government Order, while examining the rules relating to the Tamil Nadu Legal Educational Service as provided under Section 33 in Part -II of Tamil Nadu Service Manual 2016, special rules were enacted. The rules do not relate only to the qualification but to a series of issues relating to constitution of the categorise of Officers, appointment to the said categories which included Director of Legal Studies, Principals of Law Colleges, Associate Professors, Assistant Professors and Part time Lecturers and also College Librarian. The education

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top