SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3545

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J.
Kesari Higher Secondary School, rep by its Secretary/Correspondent - Petitioner 
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Director of School Education and Ors. – Respondents
W.P. No.24666 of 2013 and M.P. Nos.1 & 2 of 2012 and W.M.P. No.5654 of 2017
Decided On : 27-02-2025 


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. J. Jayamalan for Mr. S. Nedunchezhiyan.
For the Respondents:Mr. A.M. Ayyadurai, Government Advocate.

The court ruled that the reduction of teacher posts violated established teacher-pupil ratios and mandated the appointment of sufficient teachers as per educational norms.

Headnote:(A) G.O.Ms.No.525, School Education Department, dated 29.12.1997 - Right to Education Act, 2009 - Staff fixation order reducing teacher posts from six to four for classes 6th to 8th - The order was found to lack justification and did not adhere to the established teacher-pupil ratio. (Paras 2, 10, 12, 16)

(B) Education Law - Teacher-Pupil Ratio - The court emphasized that the minimum number of teachers must not fall below the number of standards, and additional teachers must be provided based on student strength. (Paras 12, 14)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner, a linguistic minority school, challenged the reduction of teacher posts from six to four for the academic year 2012-2013, citing a lack of justification in the staff fixation order.

Findings of Court:
The court found the reduction unsustainable and directed the regularization of staff fixation for standards 6th to 8th, ordering the release of due salaries.

Issues: The main issues included the justification for the reduction of teacher posts and adherence to the teacher-pupil ratio as per relevant government orders.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the impugned order ignored the established teacher-pupil ratio and the Full Bench's interpretation of the relevant government order, necessitating the appointment of at least six teachers for the classes.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

ORDER :

(C. SARAVANAN, J.)

The Petitioner, a Linguistic minority School which is getting a Government aid is before this Court. It is aggrieved by the Impugned Staff Fixation Order dated 22.12.2012, letter dated 25.02.2013 and the Appellate Order dated 12.04.2013 of the 2nd Respondent, Chief Educational Officer.

2. By the Impugned Staff Fixation Order dated 22.12.2012, the number of posts of (Middle School) teachers in the Petitioner School have been reduced to four from six for the Academic year 2012-2013.

3. Relevant portion of the aforesaid Impugned Staff Fixation Order dated 22.12.2012 is extracted hereunder;

4. The reason for reducing the number of posts of Teachers from six to four for classes 6th to 8th at the Petitioner School for the Academic Year 2013-2014 as stated in the Impugned Staff Fixation Order dated 22.12.2012. It reads as follows;

5. There are no reasons stated in Column.3 of Annexure I in the aforesaid impugned staff fixation order dated 22.12.2012 with regard to reducing the number of posts of Teachers from six to four for classes 6th to 8th at the Petitioner School.

6. Aggrieved by the aforesaid staff fixation order, the Petitioner School preferred an appeal which was also rejected by the 2nd Respondent vide order dated 25.02.2013 impugned in the present writ petition.

7. Operative Portion of the order dated 25.02.2013 rejecting the appeal preferred by the Petitioner School against the staff fixation order is as under:

8. The admitted position of Teacher-Pupil ratio for Standards 6th to 8th at the Petitioner School at that point of time when the cause of action arose is captured in Para 6 of the Counter Affidavit, which reads as follows:

“6.It is submitted that in the above scenarios, the assessment of Grant for teaching posts in the petitioners school during 2012-2013 was found as follows:

StandardEnglish MediumTelugu MediumTotal
No. of StudentsNo. of Students
6th101323
7th231740
8th302151
Total6351114

It is submitted that, however, considering the two medium of classes i.e., English and Telugu, 4 teacher posts were left remained and the additional two posts which were prevailing all along only have been treated as surplus and surrendered for redeployment to the needy schools.”

9. The learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Respondents have relied upon G.O.Ms.No.525, School Education Department, dated 29.12.1997, to justify the reduction of the number of posts of teachers from six to four at the Petitioner School for the Academic year 2012-2013.

10. It is also evident from a reading of Paragraph No.5 of the Counter Affidavit filed in support of the defense by the learned counsel for the Respondents. Para NO.5 of the Counter Affidavit reads as under;

5. As per the above G.O the teacher-pupil ratio for the standards VI to VIII has to be followed as follows:

(a) The teacher-pupil ratio of 1:40 will be followed minimum of 2 Secondary Grade Teachers upto a strength of 80 will be sanctioned.

(b) For every additional strength of 40, one post of Secondary Teacher will be sanctioned i.e., the third post at 100, the fourth at 140, the fifth post at 180 and so on.

(c) Regarding the bifurcation of a standard, additional sections will be created when the strength exceeds 60 and so on in slabs of 40.

(d) It is further humbly submitted that the above staff strength shall be fixed by the District Educational Officer concerned for High and Higher Secondary Schools. Those who may be rendered surplus strength due to application of these norms, shall as far as possible be redeployed to the needy schools. The redeployment of staff in schools shall be done by Director of School Education and Director of Elementary Education as the case may be.

11. Further, in Paragraph No.10 of the additional counter affidavit, the Respondents have stated as follows:

“10. Further it is submitted that as per EMIS strength as on 01.08.2024 there are 238 students are available in the class 6,7,8 both Telugu and English medium and the staff fixation ord

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top