Judgment :

A.C. Behera, J.

1. This Second Appeal has been preferred against the confirming judgment.

2 . The Appellants of this Second Appeal were the defendant Nos.1 to 7 before the Trial Court in the suit, vide T.S. No.176 of 1988-I and they were the Appellants in the First Appeal vide T.A. No.113 of 1994.

The Respondent Nos.1 of this Second Appeal was the sole plaintiff before the Trial Court in the suit, vide T.S. No.176 of 1988-I and he was the Respondent No.1 before the First Appellate Court in T.A. No.113 of 1994.

Respondent No.2 of this Second Appeal was the proforma defendant No.8 before the Trial Court in the suit, vide T.S. No.176 of 1988-I and he was the proforma Respondent No.2 before the First Appellate Court in T.A. No.113 of 1994.

3 . The suit of the plaintiff (who is the Respondent No.1 in this Second Appeal) before the Trial Court vide T.S. No.176 of 1988-I was a suit for declaration and permanent injunction.

4 . The case of the plaintiff as per the averments made by him in his plaint vide T.S. No.176 of 1988-I was that, the suit properties were originally belonged to Hadibandhu Mohanty (proforma defendant