Judgment :

1. This Second Appeal has been preferred against the confirming judgment.

The Respondent Nos.1 of this Second Appeal was the sole plaintiff before the Trial Court in the suit, vide T.S. No.176 of 1988-I and he was the Respondent No.1 before the First Appellate Court in T.A. No.113 of 1994.

3 . The suit of the plaintiff (who is the Respondent No.1 in this Second Appeal) before the Trial Court vide T.S. No.176 of 1988-I was a suit for declaration and permanent injunction.

So, without getting any way, the plaintiff approached the Civil Court by filing a suit vide T.S. No.176 of 1988-I against the defendants praying for declaration of his right, title, interest and possession over the suit properties and to injunct the defendant Nos.1 to 7 permanently from interfering into the peaceful possession of the plaintiff over the suit properties.

When, dispute arose concerning the ownership and possession of the suit properties between the father of the defendant Nos.1 to 7 and proforma defendant No.8, then, the said matter was decided in their village panchayat. It was decided in their village panchayat that, Hadibandhu Mo