IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
M. Vasuki - Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department - Respondent
W.P. No. 961 of 2025, W.M. P. No. 1173 of 2025
Decided On : 14-02-2025
ORDER :
1. This writ petition has been filed to for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated 13.12.2024 bearing Na.Ka.No.4070/2024/H1(Va) issued by the 6th respondent herein and quash the same as contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd to 6th respondents to consider the petitioner’s application dated 14.11.2018 bearing Registration No.DTCP/P/068972/2017 in the light of Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 and consequently regularise the petitioner’s unapproved plot in S.No.522(part), Sanganur Village, Block 13, Coimbatore Ward No.18, Coimbatore North, forming a part of Sanganur Detailed Development Plan No.7.
2. The case of the Petitioner is that she is the owner of the land in B. No.5/22(Part), Sanganur Village, Block 13, Coimbatore Ward No.18, Coimbatore North Taluk. The said property was purchased from Mr. C.Soundrajan, vide a Sale Deed dated 22.02.1996 registered as Doc.No. 1791 of 1996, on the file of the Gandhipuram SRO (hereinafter referred to as 'Subject Land').
3. The Petitioner approached the 4th to 6th Respondents for regularisation of the unapproved Plot by filing an application dated 14.11.2018 bearing reference number DTCP/P/0689722/2017 under the Regularisation of Unapproved Plots and Layouts Rules, 2017. Upon scrutiny of the application, the Petitioner was informed that her application is eligible for granting Regularisation. The Petitioner was issued a Challan dated 07.02.2024 for a sum of Rs.1,79,500/- payable to the 5th Respondent Corporation and another Challan dated 07.02.2024 for a sum of Rs.62,825/- payable to the 3rd Respondent towards Regularisation Fee.
4. Pursuant thereto, on 09.02.2024, the Petitioner deposited the said sum of Rs.1,79,500/- in the 5th Respondent Corporation's Bank Account. Similarly, on 09.02.2024, the Petitioner deposited a sum of Rs.62,825/- in favour of the 3rd Respondent towards Regularisation Fee vide Challan No.20140207019560 through the State Bank of India, Treasury Branch.
5. Subsequently, the 6th Respondent vide the impugned order dated Nil.12.2024 (signed on 12.12.2024) bearing Na.Ka.No.4070/2024/H1(Va) rejected the Petitioner's application for regularization of the plot by stating that a portion of the Petitioner's plot is designated for a proposed 'Scheme Road’. Aggrieved by the same, the Petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition.
6. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner would submit that she was informed that the Regularisation of the Plot could not be granted, as a detailed development plan had been approved by the 3rd Respondent under Section 29 of the Act as early as in the year 1994, with part of the Subject Land (approximately 1 cent) reserved for a proposed Scheme Road.
7. The subject land has been in possession and ownership of the Petitioner since its purchase in the year 1996. Though it appears that a portion of the Subject Land was notified under the Act as early as in the year 1994, wherein a part of the Subject Land (approximately 1 cent) was reserved for a proposed Scheme Road, the subject land continued to remain in possession of the Petitioner and the same has not been acquired by the concerned Respondents till date.
8. It is submitted that despite the lapse of nearly 31 years now, the land has not been acquired for the purpose for which it was reserved/designated. It would therefore be in contravention of the scheme and Section 38 of the Act to not regularise the unapproved plot under the garb of the Subject Land being reserved/designated for a Scheme Road. Further, the same would contravene her right under Article 300A of the Constitution of India.
9. It is further submitted that the application for regularisation was filed in the year 2018, and the requisite fee, as directed by the respondents, was paid in the month of February 2024. Despite having received a total sum of Rs.2,42,325/- towards Regular
Failure to acquire land within three years results in its release from reservation under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, violating property rights.
Land reserved under planning laws is deemed released if not acquired within three years, as per Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
Failure to acquire land within three years from the publication of a detailed development plan results in automatic release from reservation under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planni....
Failure to acquire land within three years from publication of a development plan results in deemed release from reservation under Section 38 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
Failure to acquire land within three years from the publication of a detailed development plan results in automatic release from reservation under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planni....
Land is deemed released from reservation if not acquired within three years as per Section 38 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
Failure to acquire land within three years results in automatic release from reservation under Section 38 of the Town and Country Planning Act.
Failure to acquire land within three years under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act results in the lapse of reservation.
Failure to initiate acquisition proceedings within the specified period results in the deemed release of the land from the Detailed Development Plan.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.