SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3520

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
S. Prakasam - Petitioner 
Versus
The Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.38207 of 2024
Decided On : 27-02-2025


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. D.R. Dhalapathy Vignesh Kumar
For the Respondents:M/s. P. Aishwarya, Government Advocate

Failure to acquire land within three years from publication of a development plan results in deemed release from reservation under Section 38 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.

Headnote:(A) Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Section 38 - Release of land - Petition for release of land from reservation due to non-acquisition within three years - Court held that failure to acquire land within stipulated time results in deemed release from reservation. (Paras 1, 9, 10, 11, 12)

(B) Legal Principle - The court consistently ruled that if land is not acquired within three years from the publication of the detailed development plan, it is deemed released from reservation. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to have their land released from reservation under Section 38 of the Act, claiming no acquisition had occurred despite a planned road. (Paras 1, 2, 3)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the land was deemed released from reservation due to the lack of acquisition within three years and directed the respondents to pass appropriate orders for release. (Paras 10, 12)

Issues: The main issue was whether the land was deemed released from reservation under Section 38 due to non-acquisition within the specified period. (Paras 9, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the failure to acquire land within three years from the publication of the detailed development plan results in a lapse of the scheme, leading to a deemed release of the land. (Paras 9, 10)

Result: Writ petition allowed.

ORDER :

(J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.)

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking direction to the respondents to declare that the petitioner's land comprised in S.F.No.779/1A, 790/1, Vadavalli Village, Perur Taluk, Coimbatore West Zone, Coimbatore Corporation and Coimbatore District measuring 13150 sq.mtrs (1.31.50 hectares) is deemed to be released from the reservation of Section 38 of Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 and consequently direct the respondents to pass an appropriate order for release of the petitioner's land comprised in S.F.No.779/1A, 790/1, Vadavalli Village, Perur Taluk, Coimbatore West Zone, Coimbatore Corporation and Coimbatore District measuring 13150 sq.mtrs (1.31.50 Hectares).

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of the property situated in S.F.Nos.779/1A, 790/1, Vadavalli Village, Perur Taluk, Coimbatore West Zone, Coimbatore Corporation and Coimbatore District measuring 13150 sq.mtrs (1.31.50 Hectares), wherein, 80 feet DD scheme road is alleged to be planned in the said area and runs across the petitioner's land, as per the DD Plan of the year 1994. But, till date no acquisition had taken place and the petitioner is in absolute possession of the same, hence the petitioner is requesting for deletion of scheme road as per Section 38 of the Town and Country Planning Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the aforesaid scheme prepared in the year 1994, it was stated that the said land would be acquired by the respondents as provided under the provision of Chapter IV of Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 (herein after referred to as Act). However, the Government had not taken any steps to acquire the land. It is also informed to the petitioner that the proposal to form the road has not been given effect to or implemented. It was also informed that under Section 25 of the Act, the Town Planning authority should have obtained approval from the Government within three years from the date of the publication of the scheme but, they have not done so. Therefore, the Government after having prepared the master plan for Coimbatore Local Planning area and issued the same in the Gazette notification in G.O.Ms.No.661, Housing and Urban Development (UDIV) Department, dated 12.10.1994 has not done anything.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though such a notification was issued under Section 30 of the Act, no follow-up action of acquisition has been taken. Therefore, the petitioner had made representation several times to the respondents to release the lands belonging to him as the same is not acquired and no more public purpose is involved under the deemed proviso viz., under Section 38 of the Act, land would be deemed to be released from reservation, allotment or designation.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would then place reliance on the similar orders passed by this Court, which are as follows:

a) In the case of A.Kondasamy Vs. The Director of Town & Country Planning, Office of the Directorate of Town and Country Planning, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Floor, E & C Market Road, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 107 and others in W.P.No.25243 of 2021 dated 29.11.2024 .

b) In the case Alagirisamy Vs. The Director of Town & Country Planning, 807, Anna Salai, Chennai, Chennai District and others in W.P.No.27672 of 2022 dated 12.12.2022 .

c) In the case of M/s.C.Vasanthadevi and another Vs. The Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department , Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 015 and others in W.P.No.29069 of 2022 dated 12.12.2022 .

d) In the case of V.Vijayalakshmi Vs. The Managing Director, Office of Director Municipality , Chepauk, Near Anna Square, Chennai - 600 005 and others in W.P.No.29297 of 2022 dated 12.12.2022 .

e) In the case of S.Ponnusamy and others Vs. The Director of Town & Country Planning, Office of Directorate of Town & Country Planning, Second, Third and Fourth Floors, E & C Market Road, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 107 and others in W.P.No.30168 o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top