SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3431

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
N.Govindaraj - Appellant 
Versus 
The Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department - Respondent 
Writ Petition No.2958 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.3243 of 2025
Decided on : 21-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Sharath Chandran for K.Ramesh Kumar
For the Respondents:Mr.N.Naveen Kumar, Government Advocate, Mr.Mukilan

Land is deemed released from reservation if not acquired within three years as per Section 38 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.

Headnote:(A) Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Section 38 - Release of land - Petitioner seeks declaration for release of land from reservation for public road as no acquisition has occurred within three years of scheme publication - Court finds that the scheme has lapsed under Section 38 due to inaction - Respondents directed to release the land within four weeks. (Paras 9, 10)

(B) Legal Principle - If land is not acquired within three years from publication of development plan, it is deemed released from reservation. (Paras 6, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is the owner of land in Coimbatore earmarked for road formation since 1990, but the government has not initiated acquisition. The petitioner filed for release based on the lapse of the scheme under Section 38.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner's land is deemed released from reservation due to the failure of the government to acquire it within the stipulated period.

Issues: The main issue was whether the land is deemed released from reservation under Section 38 due to the lack of acquisition within three years.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the provisions of Section 38 clearly state that if acquisition is not completed within three years, the land is automatically released from reservation.

Result: Writ petition stands allowed.

ORDER :

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking direction to the respondents to declare that the petitioner's land comprised in Survey Nos.230/2, 231/1, 231/2 Coimbatore is deemed to be released from the reservation of petitioner land for formation of public road as per the provision of Section 38 of Town and Country Planning Act and consequently direct the respondents to pass an appropriate order or release of the petitioner's land comprised in Survey Nos.230/2, 231/1. 231/2 in Ramanathapuram Village, Coimbatore South Taluk, Coimbatore.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the the absolute owner of the property comprised in Survey Nos.230/3, 231/1, 231/2 at Ramanathapuram Village, Coimbatore South Taluk, Coimbatore to the total extent of 2.21 acres. The lands are under his possession and enjoyment, and are put into use for agricultural purposes. The grievance of the petitioner is that, when the Town Planning Scheme was prepared in 1990 for Coimbatore Urban area, the town planning authorities earmarked a portion of the petitioner's lands comprised in Survey Nos.230/3, 231/1, 231/2, Coimbatore South Taluk, Coimbatore for formation of 80 feet AA proposed Scheme road and another 60 feet BB Proposed Scheme road. But so far the Government has not taken any initiative to acquire the petitioner’s lands. Therefore, the petitioner approached the third respondent for release of the land from this scheme. He was informed that the lands earmarked for formation of proposed road in the development plan No 11. MAP 2 the Coimbatore Town Planning Scheme will be implemented after a review by the Member Secretary of the Coimbatore Town and Country Planning in consultation with the land owners and further decision will be taken by the Town Planning officers. The petitioner also made several representation to the respondents to release the land, but the same was not considered. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the aforesaid scheme prepared in the year 1990, it was stated that the said land would be acquired by the respondents as provided under the provision of Chapter IV of Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 (herein after referred to as Act). However, the Government had not taken any steps to acquire the land. It is also informed to the petitioner that the proposal to form the road has not been given effect to or implemented. It was also informed that under Section 25 of the Act, the Town Planning authority should have obtained approval from the Government within three years from the date of the publication of the scheme but, they have not done so. Therefore, the Government after having prepared the master plan for Coimbatore Local Planning area and issued the same in the Gazette notification in G.O.Ms.No.661, Housing and Urban Development (UDIV) Department, dated 12.10.1994 has not done anything.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though such a notification was issued under Section 30 of the Act, no follow-up action of acquisition has been taken. Therefore, the petitioner had made representation several times to the respondents to release the lands belonging to him as the same is not acquired and no more public purpose is involved under the deemed proviso viz., under Section 38 of the Act, land would be deemed to be released from reservation, allotment or designation.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would then place reliance on the similar orders passed by this Court, which are as follows:

a) In the case of A.Kondasamy Vs. The Director of Town & Country Planning, Office of the Directorate of Town and Country Planning, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Floor, E & C Market Road, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 107 and others in W.P.No.25243 of 2021 dated 29.11.2024.

b) In the case Alagirisamy Vs. The Director of Town & Country Planning, 807, Anna Salai, Chennai, Chennai District and others in W.P.No.27672 of 2022 dated 12.12.2022.

c) I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top