SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3671

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
A.M. Annalakshmi - Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu - Respondent
W.P. Nos. 18147, 18149, 18150 of 2023
Decided On : 13-02-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : V. Ravikumar
For the Respondents: S. Prabhakaran, G. Vardini Karthik

The court affirmed that part-time service can be counted for pension benefits, supporting the claim based on prior judgments.

Headnote:(A) Pension - Calculation of service - The petitioners, having served as part-time vocational instructors and subsequently as full-time instructors, sought to include 50% of their part-time service for pension calculation - The court found that prior judgments supported this inclusion for those absorbed before 01.04.2003. (Paras 2-11)

(B) Delay and laches - The court addressed the respondents' argument regarding the petitioners' delay in claiming benefits, noting that the petitioners' cases were valid based on previous court orders. (Paras 6-7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners were part-time vocational instructors who retired between 2013 and 2019 and sought to have their part-time service counted towards pension benefits.

Findings of Court:
The court directed that the respondents must grant the benefit of counting half of the part-time service for pension purposes within sixteen weeks.

Issues: The main issues included whether the petitioners could count part-time service for pension and the implications of delay in filing claims.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioners were entitled to count 50% of their part-time service for pension calculation based on prior judgments, emphasizing that their claims were not barred by delay.

Result: Writ Petitions allowed.

ORDER :

1. Since the issue involved in all the petitions are one and the same, they are taken up together and a common order is being passed.

2. The brief facts of the case in W.P.No.18147 of 2023 is that initially, the petitioner was appointed as a part-time vocational instructor on 12.02.1989 and subsequently, she was posted as a full time vocational instructor with effect from 07.11.1997. After rendering for more than 29 years of service to the Department, the petitioner retired on 31.05.2018. The petitioner was sanctioned with pension by calculating the regular service rendered from 07.11.1997 to 31.05.2018 and as per various orders of this Court and orders of the Apex Court, if 50% part time service is taken into account, the petitioner will get some revised pensionary benefits. Hence the petitioner submitted representation to the respondents, the same has not been considered by the respondents, hence this petition.

3. The brief facts of the case in W.P.No.18149 of 2023 is that initially, the petitioner was appointed as a part-time vocational instructor on 15.02.1985 and subsequently, she was posted as a full time vocational instructor with effect from 10.05.1995. After rendering for more than 28 years of service to the Department, the petitioner retired on 31.05.2013. The petitioner was sanctioned with pension by calculating the regular service rendered from 10.05.1995 to 31.05.2013 and as per various orders of this Court and orders of the Apex Court, if 50% part time service is taken into account, the petitioner will get some revised pensionary benefits. Hence the petitioner submitted representation to the respondents, the same has not been considered by the respondents, hence this petition.

4. The brief facts of the case in W.P.No.18150 of 2023 is that initially, the petitioner was appointed as a part-time vocational instructor on 15.02.1989 and subsequently, he was posted as a full time vocational instructor with effect from 07.11.1997. After rendering for more than 30 years of service to the Department, the petitioner retired on 31.05.2019 The petitioner was sanctioned with pension by calculating the regular service rendered from 15.2.1989 to 06.11.1997 and as per various orders of this Court and orders of the Apex Court, if 50% part time service is taken into account, the petitioner will get some revised pensionary benefits. Hence the petitioner submitted representation to the respondents, the same has not been considered by the respondents, hence this petition.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the act of the respondents in non-adding the 50% part-time services along with regular services as they were regularly absorbed prior to 01.04.2003 would amount to hostile discrimination and as against various orders of this Court and is 'unfair and unjustified' and the petitioners are entitled to count their 50% part-time service along with the regular services rendered by them, for the purpose of qualifying service for pension.

6. The learned Government Advocate (Education) appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 submits that in W.A.No.882 of 2017 batch cases, it is also rendered that “(i) 50% of the services rendered by the respondents herein as Part Time Vocational Instructor (either as Single part time or double part time Vocational instructor) shall be counted for the purpose of computing pension and other retrial benefits.(ii) The above said benefit shall be extended only to the respondents in these writ appeals and or the persons similarly situated like that of the respondents herein, whose cases are pending before this Court. Thus it is made clear that the above said benefit shall not be extended to any other future cases that may be filed on this account, on the ground of delay and laches, since all along they have not come up before this Court and remained as fence-sitters. It is also needless to point out that allowing such cases would amount to opening the pandora's box touching upon the financ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top