Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr.Justice M.Dhandapani, J
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vellore Electricity Distribution Circle, rep. by its Superintending Engineer – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Employees' Provident Fund Tribunal (Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India) – Respondent
ORDER :
(M. DHANDAPANI, J.)
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent in ATA No.423 (13) of 2006 and quash its order dated 31.03.2010.
2.The brief facts of the case is that the All India Trade Union Congress [in short 'AITUC'] made a representation/ complaint to the second respondent alleging that the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Vellore Electricity Circle is engaging many labourers through contractors and those labourers are not given any social security benefits such as provident fund or pension fund and the petitioner establishment disputed their liability to extend the contributory provident fund or pension fund for the contract labourers on the ground that such workers are not directly engaged by the establishment and hence they are not employees.
3.Therefore, an inquiry under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 [hereinafter referred to as 'Act'] was initiated by the second respondent and thereafter an order dated 28.02.2005 was passed by the second respondent wherein it was held that the Act applies to TNEB, Vellore Electricity Circle insofar a
The principal employer is responsible for ensuring provident fund contributions for contract workers, as they are considered employees under the Act.
The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act applies to employees not covered by a pension scheme, and the maintainability of the Writ Petition was upheld under Article 226.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the members of a co-operative society cannot be construed as employees, and the absence of an employer-employee relationship is crucial in det....
The definition of 'employee' under the EPF Act includes contract workers, and dues must be determined based on identified beneficiaries.
The applicability of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act to a Cooperative Society is subject to the conditions specified in Section 16, and reliance on specific sections or....
The definition of 'employee' under the Employees’ Provident Funds Act includes temporary employees, mandating employer contribution regardless of employment type.
Point of Law : Provident Fund is not a tax. It is an amount collectable to the benefit of an individual identified employee as a social welfare measure.
The process of appointment of regular employees and apprentices are different, and the status of individuals as employees or apprentices should be determined based on the evidence presented.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
