IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
P.M. Alphonse - Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of School Education, Chennai - Respondent
W.P. No. 3761 of 2023
Decided On : 10-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility for incentive increment based on m.phil. qualification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's representation for increment rejection based on service record. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court references earlier judgments pertinent to similar cases. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court quashes impugned decision directing the grant of increments. (Para 10) |
| 5. court analysis of prior permission requirement and retrospective effect of g.o. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. quashing of impugned proceedings and directing sanction of incentive increment. (Para 14) |
| 7. final order allowing the writ petition. (Para 15) |
ORDER :
1. This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.5158/Aa3/2021 dated 30.11.2021 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to sanction incentive increment to the petitioners for acquiring M.Phil., degree as per G.O(1D)No.18, School Education Department dated 18.01.2013 in ratification of M.Phil., degree obtained by the petitioner in the year 2013, without entry in the service record, with all consequential and other attendant benefits, including arrears of salary, within a stipulated period.
2. The petitioner was initially appointed as B.T.Assistant (Maths) in School Education on 16.09.2005. While so, he acquired higher qualification of M.Phil., degree after obtaining permission from the Headmaster of the school, whereas the same has not been entered in the Service Record since the M.Phil., degree is not relevant for promotion or for incentive.
3. The Government issued orders in G.O(1D).No.18 School Education Department dated 18.01.2013 to grant incentive increment for M.Ed., or M.Phil., or Ph.D., degree on condition that a teacher is entitled for two incentive increments in his entire service career. Since M.Ed., degree was dispensed with in Correspondence Course, the Government has decided to sanction incentive increment for M.Phil., or Ph.D., degree as per G.O(1D).No.18 dated 18.01.2013.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the Petitioner submitted representation seeking for an incentive increment for having acquired M.Phil., degree as per G.O.(1D).No.18 dated 18.01.2013, whereas the same has not been considered in view of the fact that there was no entry in the Service Record for the same. The Government issued orders in Govt.Letr.(1D).No.356/School Education dated 02.11.2007 ratifying the M.Phil., degree obtained by teachers in the category of Headmaster and P.G.Assistant without availing permission from the department with instructions that in the event of any higher qualifications acquired in the future, it will be resulting in disciplinary action against the concerned teacher. When the Government has decided to grant an incentive increment for M.Phil., degree in respect of B.T. Assistant teachers as per G.O(1D).No.18 dated 18.01.2013, the M.Phil., degree obtained by him without prior permission ought to be ratified by the department.
5. Thereafter, the Petitioner submitted representation to the department seeking a grant of incentive increment. The 1st Respondent issued proceedings in Na.Ka.No.069381/K/E1/2018 dated 21.10.2020 calling for the list of teachers who acquired higher qualifications prior to 09.03.2020 in order to sanction an incentive increment for the same. However, the Petitioner was not considered for grant of an incentive increment even as per the proceedings of 1st Respondent dated 21.10.2020 on the premises that the Petitioner has not availed permission to study for an M.Phil., degree.
6. The Petitioner filed a writ petition before this Court in W.P.No.7958 of 2021, wherein this Court passed orders dated 29.03.2021, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 03.10.2013 and 08.11.2013 and pass orders within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.
7. Consequen
Incentive increments for teachers acquiring higher qualifications are to be granted even without prior permission if obtained before relevant government orders, emphasizing the non-retrospective appl....
The main legal point established is the prospective implementation of government orders granting financial benefits and the obligation to recover any erroneously granted excess money.
Incentive increments for teachers cannot be denied based on the mode of degree acquisition, as prior permission for higher education is a regulatory requirement, not a disqualifying factor.
The court affirmed that teachers are entitled to incentive increments for higher qualifications, regardless of prior permission for study mode.
The eligibility for employment does not preclude the grant of incentive increments for higher qualifications obtained through correspondence by teachers.
Prior permission is not required for teachers to claim incentive increments for higher qualifications.
Incentive increments for teachers cannot be denied based on the lack of prior permission for higher education, as the policy aims to encourage qualification enhancement.
G.O.Ms.No.91 (2009) bars distance M.Phil for employment but not post-employment incentive increments for teachers with permission.
G.O.Ms.No.91, 2009 inapplicable to incentive increments for serving teachers' part-time higher degrees.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.