IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice R.SAKTHIVEL
Nagappa Gounder (Died) – Appellant
Versus
K.V.Duraisamy (Died) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R. Sakthivel, J.
This Second Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated December 11, 2019 passed in A.S.No.41 of 2006 by the 'Subordinate Court, Bhavani' ['First Appellate Court' for brevity], whereby the Appeal Suit was partly allowed and the Judgment and Decree dated November 30, 2004 passed in O.S.No.192 of 2001 by the ‘II Additional District Munsif Court, Bhavani' ['Trial Court' for brevity] was partly modified.
2. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties will be referred to as per their array in the Original Suit.
TRAJECTORY OF THE CASE
3. The plaintiff filed a Suit for declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction. The Trial Court dismissed the same, challenging which, the plaintiff preferred an appeal in A.S.No.41 of 2006 before the First Appellate Court and the same was dismissed on April 27, 2007. Assailing the Judgment and Decree dated April 27, 2007 of the First Appellate Court, the plaintiff approached this Court vide S.A.No.335 of 2008 (earlier Second Appeal).
3.1. During pendency of the earlier Second Appeal, the sole appellant therein / sole plaintiff passed away and hence, the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein were brought on
Legal heirs' inclusion in proceedings remains valid despite procedural defects; boundary disputes resolved based on evidence support for ownership as established in previous deeds.
The First Appellate Court correctly reversed the trial court's decree due to insufficient evidence from the plaintiffs to establish title over the suit property.
Long-standing possession supported by revenue records can establish entitlement to property, negating the need for a formal declaration of title.
The court affirmed that the Suit Property is a Natham Pathway, granting plaintiffs limited injunction against obstruction until defendants prove their title.
A simple suit for injunction is not maintainable when there is a dispute over title, and the plaintiffs must prove possession within the claimed boundaries.
A suit for injunction is maintainable without a declaration of title when the title is not disputed, and survey boundaries are conclusive proof unless modified by a court.
The court clarified that reliance on an unchallenged Commissioner's report for title determination is improper without accurate property measurement, and limitation for recovery of possession involve....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.