SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3838

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. SARAVANAN, J.
M/s.Flinto Learning Solutions Private Limited - Petitioner
Versus
The Joint Commissioner of Service Tax (South), Nandanam, Chennai & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.No.264 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.7498 of 2022
Decided On : 02-01-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mrs. Radhika Chandrasekhar.
For the Respondents: Mr. M. Santhanaraman Senior Panel Counsel.

A person under investigation is ineligible for voluntary disclosure under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 as per Section 125(1)(f).

Headnote:(A) Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - Sections 124 and 125(1)(f) - Petition for mandamus to recognize tax payment of Rs.22,08,034/- and issue Discharge Certificate was dismissed as petitioner, having been under investigation, was ineligible for voluntary disclosure claimed under the Scheme. The court found Form SVLDRS-1 was erroneously accepted due to the embargo in Section 125(1)(f) - The petitioner made a mistake regarding eligibility while filing the declaration. (Paras 10, 11, 25, 28)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, having received a show cause notice regarding tax liability after being notified of the outstanding amount, claimed voluntary disclosure under the SVLDRS Scheme but was challenged due to ongoing investigations against it.

Findings of Court:
The court found the petitioner was not entitled to file the declaration due to disqualification under Section 125(1)(f) of the SVLDRS Scheme, 2019.

Issues: The main questions involved whether the petitioner qualified under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme following prior investigations and if the payment made could be adjusted.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that a person under investigation or audit is barred from making a voluntary disclosure under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, which includes specific definitions of eligibility and disqualification. (Paras 23, 24)

Result: Writ Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner applies for resolution of tax liability. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. new show cause notice complicates petitioner's claims. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments regarding eligibility under svldrs are presented. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. clarification on scheme eligibility. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. respondents argue against petitioner's claims. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. court evaluates petitioner's eligibility under svldrs. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
7. conditions for issuance of discharge certificate outlined. (Para 26 , 27)
8. court dismisses petition and directs further action. (Para 28 , 29)

ORDER :

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a mandamus, to direct the respondents to treat the tax payment of Rs.22,08,034/- paid on 27.12.2019 as fulfillment of tax liability of the petitioner under Form SVLDRS-3 dated 07.01.2020 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to issue Discharge Certificate in Form SVLDRS-4 for settling the dispute of the petitioner under the provisions of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 read with Sabka Vishwas Rule, 2009.

2. The petitioner was a recipient on taxable service of Online Information Database Access and Retrieval Services which was subjected to tax on reverse charge basis in terms of Section 68(2) of the FINANCE ACT , 1994 read with Notification No.30/2012-Service Tax (ST) dated 20.06.2012.

3. It appears that as a recipient of the aforesaid service, the petitioner had failed to pay service tax on reverse charge basis and therefore summons were issued to the petitioner on 12.06.2019. It appears that the Director General of GST Intelligence (Goods and Service Tax) under the GST Act, an Officer of DGGI had sent email to the petitioner on 23.12.2019 and 26.12.2019, whereby, the petitioner was informed that the petitioner was liable to pay the tax of Rs.22,08,034/-.

4. A copy of the said attachment to the email has been kept along with the typed set of papers. The said email is said to have been received by the petitioner from the personal mail ID of the Officer's name Ramesh Babu from his email address dr.aadesh@rediffmail.com and was addressed to one kr sunil@yahoo.com of the petitioner. On receipt of the aforesaid email, the petitioner paid the aforesaid amount of Rs.22,08,034/- on 27.12.2019 and thereafter filed a declaration in Form SVLDRS-1 on 30.12.2019 declaring the total tax liability of Rs.22,08,034/- as under the category of a person making a “Voluntary Disclosure”.

5. The declarations filed by the petitioner in Form SVLDRS-1 on 30.12.2019 was acknowledged in the system and an auto generated email was also sent to the petitioner on 31.01.2020, whereby, the declaration filed by the petitioner on 30.12.2019 in Form SVLDRS-1 was acknowledged. Thereafter, Form SVLDRS-3 was issued to the petitioner. However, after the aforesaid email was received by the petitioner in Form SVLDRS-3 which was downloaded on 31.01.2020, the petitioner did not receive Form SVLDRS-4. Thus, the petitioner has approached this Court.

6. During the interregnum, after filing of the Writ Petition, the petitioner has also received a Show Cause Notice dated 22.12.2020 bearing Show Cause Notice No.40/2020-Service Tax (ST). Show Cause Notice NO.40/2020-Service Tax (ST) dated 22.12.2020 has been issued to the petitioner by the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Madurai Regional Unit, wherein, the petitioner has been called upon to pay a sum of Rs.32,29,747/- towards Service Tax, Education Cess, Secondary Higher Education Cess, Swachh Bharat Cess etc., for the period between October 2014 to June 2017.

7. The Show Cause Notice also seeks to appropriate payment of Rs.22,08,034/- paid by the petitioner on 27.12.2019 which was offered by the petitioner towards the tax liability of the petitioner on 30.12.2019 in its declaration in Form SVLDRS-1 dated 30.12.2019. It appears that the Show Cause Notice No.40/2020-Service Tax (ST) was also adjudicated and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top