Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Subramaniyya Swamy Thirukoil Swathanthira Parabalana Sthalathar Sabha – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by Secretary to Government – Respondent
ORDER :
C.SARAVANAN, J.
The Petitioner has challenged the Impugned Order dated 29.05.2024 passed by the 3rd Respondent/Regional Joint Commissioner in his proceedings in O.A.No.35 of 2021.
2. By the Impugned Order dated 29.05.2024 in O.A.No.35 of 2021, the3rd Respondent/Regional Joint Commissioner has set aside Order dated 12.11.2012 bearing Pro.RC.No. 12001/2007 of the 4th Respondent/ Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer of Arulmigu Subramaniya Swamy Temple Tiruchendur, Tuticoirn District. The operative portion of the Impugned Order reads as under:
3. The Impugned Order dated 29.05.2024 in O.A.No.35 of 2021 of the 3rd Respondent/Regional Joint Commissioner is pursuant to an earlier Order dated 08.01.2019 passed by the 2nd Respondent/Commissioner of HR&CE Department in R.P.No.320 of 2017-D2.
4. By the aforesaid Order dated 08.01.2019, the 2nd Respondent/Commissioner of HR&CE Department had directed as follows:-
“To decide the above issues inter alia, a full fledged enquiry ought to be conducted by examining witnesses, marking relevant documents by following procedures laid down under CPC. This forum, while exercising revisional jurisdiction is not in a position to conduct a full fledged e
The court upheld the recognized rights of a religious community to perform rituals in a temple and deemed the ongoing civil proceedings as sufficient to adjudicate any disputes regarding those rights....
The court held that hereditary rights to temple administration supersede unilateral executive appointments when trusteeship disputes are pending, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements and p....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to adhere to principles of natural justice and provide notice to affected parties before issuing directions or circulars that may a....
The availability of an alternative remedy of appeal before the Commissioner under Section 69 of the HR and CE Act rendered the writ petition not maintainable.
The court affirmed the hereditary trusteeship of defendants, ruling that plaintiffs failed to prove mismanagement or entitlement to non-hereditary trusteeship under the Hindu Religious Charitable End....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
