SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3969

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT 
M.S. RAMESH, A.D. MARIA CLETE, JJ.
The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Chennai - Appellant
Versus
R. Saravanan & Ors. - Respondents
WA(MD) Nos.1470 to 1474, 1479 & 2355 of 2024 and CMP.(MD) Nos.11458, 11465, 11467, 11468, 11477, 11500 & 16311 of 2024
Decided On : 21-01-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. P. Wilson, Senior Counsel for M/s.V.Panner Selvam, Standing Counsel.
For the Respondents: Mr. M. Ajmal Khan, for M/s.Ajmal Associates, Mr. V. Thirumal Mr.SRA.Ramachandran, Additional Government Pleader, Mr. J. Lawrance.

Eligibility for ex-servicemen’s concessions must be assessed at the application date, not recruitment date; subsequent recruitment does not negate pre-existing claims.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 - Section 3(j) - Ex-servicemen's eligibility for appointments and concessions - Respondents, as ex-servicemen, applied for multiple posts before recruitment in Group IV; their claims for Group II A services based on timely application were affirmed, rejecting the appellants' argument about preclusion post-recruitment. (Paras 4, 6, 8, 12, 16)

(B) Interpretation of statutory provisions - The bar for claiming ex-serviceman concession only applies to those already recruited; eligibility assessed at application date not on recruitment date, thereby safeguarding candidates from procedural delays. (Paras 6, 17, 40)

(C) Procedural delays - Recruitment process complexity cannot disadvantage candidates acting in good faith under reservation policies. (Paras 20, 22)

Facts of the case:
The respondents, all ex-servicemen, applied for various posts notified by the TNPSC, securing positions under Group IV due to earlier result publication but sought eligibility for Group II A selections claimed prior to recruitment.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the respondents' claims for Group II A posts, highlighting their rights based on earlier applications, concurrent with statutory interpretations favoring clarification of entitlements for ex-servicemen.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was the application and interpretation of Section 3(j) regarding ex-servicemen's rights post-recruitment.

Ratio Decidendi: The decision emphasized that an ex-serviceman's eligibility must be determined based on application timing and not subsequent recruitment, thus ensuring fairness in the process.

Result: Writ appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. eligibility of ex-servicemen for group ii a posts (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. contest of eligibility regarding ex-serviceman concession (Para 5 , 6)
3. interpretation of section 3(j) regarding multiple applications (Para 7 , 8)
4. case law supporting eligibility criteria based on application date (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. eligibility determination relies on cut-off dates. (Para 13)
6. principles of statutory interpretation favoring applicants (Para 14 , 15 , 19)
7. procedural delays do not negate prior claims. (Para 18)
8. protecting rights of ex-servicemen from procedural delays (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
9. different factual context negates reliance on irrelevant cases (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
10. clear framework for ex-servicemen's multiple applications. (Para 30)
11. administrative inaction disadvantaging candidates (Para 31 , 32)
12. irrelevance of compliance-based arguments in context (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
13. ambiguity in regulations causing hardship to applicants (Para 37 , 38)
14. conclusion on applicability of section 3(j) (Para 39 , 40)

JUDGMENT :

A.D. Maria Clete, J.

The appellants in these writ appeals assail the Common Order of the learned Single Judge dated 11.06.2024 in WP(MD)Nos.11995, 11833, 2057, and 1425 to 1427 of 2024. Since these appeals involve common questions of law and facts, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The learned Single Judge, in the impugned order, directed the appellants to consider the respondents' entitlement to appointment under the Ex-serviceman category for Group II A posts, as notified in Notification No.3 of 2022 dated 23.02.2022, based on merit and to permit their participation in the ensuing stages of the selection process.

2. The respondents/writ petitioners, all ex-servicemen, had applied for various positions notified by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) under separate notifications. These included Group II A posts under Notification No.3/2022 dated 23.02.2022, Group IV services under Notification No.7/2022 dated 30.03.2022, and technical posts such as Field Surveyor, Draftsman, and Surveyor-cum-Assistant Draughtsman under Notification No.2/2022 dated 30.06.2022.

3. The results for Notification No.2/2022 were declared on 15.02.2023, followed by the results for Group IV services under Notification No.7/2022 on 24.03.2023. The respondents successfully secured posts under these notifications and subsequently joined the respective services. However, the results for Group II A services under Notification No.3/2022 were published much later, on 08.04.2024, wherein the respondents were also found to have been selected. Considering their prior appointments, this situation has given rise to competing claims regarding the respondents' eligibility for participation in the subsequent stages of the selection process for Group II A posts.

4. It is not in dispute that the respondents/writ petitioners qualify as ex-servicemen within the meaning of Section 3(j) of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016. There is also no controversy regarding the sequence of events: the notifications for Group II and II A services were issued earlier than the Group IV notification, but the results for Group IV services were published earlier. Consequently, the respondents, having been selected under the ex-serviceman category for Group IV services, joined those posts. The question arose as to whether the respondents, appointed to Group IV services under the ex-serviceman category, are eligible to claim the ex-serviceman concession for recruitment to Group II-A services.

5. The appellants, representing the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC), strongly contended that the respondents were precluded from claiming the ex-serviceman concession a second time. According to the appellants, the first proviso to Section 3(j) of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 explicitly bars ex-servicem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top