SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4269

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. Suresh Kumar, C. Saravanan, JJ.
The Government of Tamil Nadu - Appellants
Vs.
S.Rajan - Respondent
W.A.No.192 of 2025
Decided On : 30-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr.R.Neelakandan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.Stalin Abimanyu Additional Government Pleader
For the Respondents: Mr.R.Subramanian for Mr.B.Ravvi

Accrued legal rights to pension benefits cannot be denied due to administrative delays in appointment.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 - Direct Recruitment Notification - Assistant Public Prosecutor (Grade II) - Writ petitions filed for inclusion in Old Pension Scheme after being appointed from reserve list - Court found delay in appointments attributable to the State and TNPSC, thus granting rights to petitioners for Old Pension Scheme benefits. (Paras 6, 10.5, 10.8)

(B) Legal Rights - The court emphasized that accrued legal rights cannot be denied due to administrative delays. (Paras 10.5, 10.8)

Facts of the case:
The writ petitioners were placed in the reserve list for the post of Assistant Public Prosecutor Grade II and were appointed only after a prolonged legal battle, despite being eligible for the Old Pension Scheme prior to the cut-off date of 01.04.2003.

Findings of Court:
The delay in appointments was attributed to the State and TNPSC, and the petitioners were entitled to benefits under the Old Pension Scheme.

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioners had a right to be included in the Old Pension Scheme despite delays in their appointment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the delay caused by the State and TNPSC should not affect the petitioners' accrued rights to the Old Pension Scheme.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

(Judgment of the Court was authored by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)

This intra-Court appeal has been directed against the common order passed by the Writ Court dated 01.03.2024 made in W.P.Nos.29880 and 19882 of 2022.

2. The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission [for brevity, herein after referred to as "the TNPSC"] has issued a notification for Direct Recruitment to the post of Assistant Public Prosecutor (Grade II) for the year 1998-2002. Both the writ petitioners applied for the post of Assistant Public Prosecutor Grade II. Totally fifty three candidates were selected to the said post and the writ petitioners were placed in the reserved list. Thereafter, though three selected candidates failed to join and since vacancies arose, immediately, the reserve list has not been operated by giving appointment to the writ petitioners.

3. Therefore, the writ petitioners and another approached the Writ Court by filing W.P.Nos.6085, 9823 and 11234 of 2004. The Writ Court, by orders dated 27.04.2006 and 21.06.2006, allowed those writ petitions by giving directions to the Department to appoint the writ petitioners in the resultant vacancies. However, the said judgment of the Writ Court was challenged at the instance of the Department by way of an intra-Court appeal in W.A.No.891 to 893 of 2007 and these writ appeals also were dismissed. As against the same, an attempt has been made by the Government to prefer a Special Leave Petition, where also, they failed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.

4. Only after loosing all these legal battle, the Government has come forward to issue G.O.(4D) No.104, Home (Courts - VI) Department dated 05.12.2007, thereby, appointment orders have been given to the writ petitioners to the post of Assistant Public Prosecutor Grade II for the Panel Year 1998-2002.

5. The writ petitioners joined into service and their seniority also were initially fixed based on the roster point and subsequently, after the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the year 2013, the same has been fixed by way of merit list fixed by the TNPSC. When this being the position, the writ petitioners were not alloted with the GPF Numbers and they have been alloted only with the contributory pension, which is the New Pension Scheme, which has been implemented by virtue of G.O.No.259, Finance (Pension) Department dated 06.08.2003 from 01.04.2003.

6. Aggrieved over the non-inclusion in the Old Pension Scheme and inclusion in the New Pension Scheme, the writ petitioners have made requests after requests to the appellant Department. Despite that, since no fruitful answer has come from them, they approached this Court by filing W.P.Nos.19880 & 19882 of 2022, seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 therein to extend the benefits of Old Pension Scheme under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 to the writ petitioners. These writ petitions were allowed through the impugned common order dated 01.03.2024.

7. Aggrieved over the same, the present writ appeal has been directed at the instance of the appellant State.

8.1. Heard Mr.R.Neelakandan, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the appellant State, who would submit that, even though the selection was over and appointments have been made, insofar as the selectees are concerned, prior to 01.04.2003, these writ petitioners have never been selected and merely because they have been in the reserve list, they cannot seek any right to be selected.

8.2. Assuming that there were some vacancies arising subsequently and based on the vacancies and pursuant to the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court, which has been confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, if appointment orders were given to them in G.O.No.104 Home (Courts VI) Department dated 05.12.2007, that shall be treated only as an appointment from 05.12.2007, that is well after the cut-off date of 01.04.2003, which is from the date the new pension scheme has come into effect. Therefore, at no stretch of imagination

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top