SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4489

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
A.D.Maria Clete, S.M.Subramaniam
K.Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Trichy District – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.M.Saravanan
For the Respondent: Mr.S.P.Maharajan, Special Government Pleader

ORDER :

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

These writ petitions have been instituted challenging the notice issued under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and the final notice issued under Section 6 of the said Act.

2. The final notice issued under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, is susceptible to an appeal under Section 10 of the said Act. Without exhausting the said alternative remedy of appeal, the petitioners have filed the present writ petitions. Therefore, the petitioners are granted liberty to prefer an appeal before the authority concerned under Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and work out their remedy in accordance with law.

3. Granting such liberty to the petitioners, the present writ petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top