SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4489

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.M.Subramaniam, A.D.Maria Clete, JJ.
K.Krishnan - Petitioner
Versus
The District Collector, Trichy District – Respondent
W.P.(MD) Nos.14551 & 14608 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.10776, 10778, 10823 & 10828 of 2025
Decided On : 10-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.M.Saravanan
For the Respondent: Mr.S.P.Maharajan, Special Government Pleader

Litigants must exhaust alternative remedies provided by law before resorting to writ petitions, as per the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 - Sections 6 and 7 - Writ petitions challenging notices issued under Land Encroachment Act - Petitioners have not exhausted the alternative remedy of appeal as provided under Section 10 - Liberty granted to petitioners to appeal before the authority concerned. (Paras 1, 2)

Facts of the case:
The writ petitions were filed challenging notices under Sections 6 and 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, without exhausting the available remedy of appeal under Section 10.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioners should first utilize the alternative remedy of appeal before the appropriate authority.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners can file writ petitions without exhausting the alternative appeal remedy provided.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the existence of an alternative remedy requires litigants to seek relief through that channel before approaching the court, leading to the dismissal of the writ petitions.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to notice under the tamil nadu land encroachment act. (Para 1)
2. right to appeal as an alternative remedy. (Para 2)
3. dismissal of writ petitions. (Para 3)

ORDER :

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

These writ petitions have been instituted challenging the notice issued under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and the final notice issued under Section 6 of the said Act.

2. The final notice issued under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, is susceptible to an appeal under Section 10 of the said Act. Without exhausting the said alternative remedy of appeal, the petitioners have filed the present writ petitions. Therefore, the petitioners are granted liberty to prefer an appeal before the authority concerned under Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and work out their remedy in accordance with law.

3. Granting such liberty to the petitioners, the present writ petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top