SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4561

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 
M.S. RAMESH, N. SENTHILKUMAR, JJ.
H. Santhosh - Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Thirupathur - Respondent
W.A. No. 401 of 2025
Decided On : 10-06-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : S.N. Subramani, M. Navin Kumar
For the Respondent: A. Selvendran

Individuals have a Constitutional right under Article 25 to be recognized as not belonging to any caste or religion, promoting equality and non-discrimination.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 25 - Recognition of an individual as not belonging to any caste or religion - The appellant's claim for issuance of such a certificate was initially rejected, citing lack of authority. Court emphasized the Constitutional mandate under Article 25, stating the state must facilitate the establishment of casteless identities. (Paras 1, 5, 9)

(B) Administrative authority - The court noted that certificates had previously been issued under similar circumstances by government authorities, contrary to the objections raised. This inconsistency necessitates a clear directive allowing for such certificates. (Paras 7, 10)

Facts of the case:
The appellant seeks recognition as not belonging to any caste or religion, affirming a commitment to raise his children in a casteless society, without benefit from caste-based reservations.

Findings of Court:
The judgment mandates the Tamil Nadu Government to issue a directive for creating a 'No Caste No Religion' certificate and instructs Revenue Authorities to process applications for the same.

Issues: The contentious issue was whether a citizen may receive a governmental certificate confirming non-affiliation to caste or religion, and the powers of Revenue Authorities in this regard.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasserts that Article 25 obliges the state to acknowledge individual rights to religious choice and casteless identity, rejecting the argument of administrative incapacity to issue such certifications.

Result: Writ Appeal allowed.

Table of Content
1. claim for certificate of no caste or religion - What is the appellant's request regarding caste and religion? (Para 1 , 6)
2. understanding caste and religion in india - How do caste and religion influence Indian society? (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. article 25 guarantees freedom of religion - How do caste and religion influence Indian society? (Para 5)
4. objections to issuing certificates - What objections were raised regarding the issuance of certificates? (Para 7 , 8)
5. promoting caste discrimination prohibition - What is the court's view on the appellant's claim? (Para 9 , 10)
6. direction for issuing no caste no religion certificate - What is the final order of the court? (Para 11)

JUDGMENT :

M.S. RAMESH, J.

1. The paramount issue that arises for adjudication in this appeal is as to whether an Indian citizen can claim for issuance of a certificate recognizing him of not belonging to any caste or religion. In the order of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P.No.1290 of 2024 dated 22.01.2024, the appellant's request has been summarily rejected by holding that the Tahsildars of the State have not been empowered by the Government to issue such a certificate.

2. In India, religion and caste are two deeply rooted social identifiers that influence many aspects of life, including personal identity, politics and social interactions. Religion in India refers to a system of belief, practices and moral values centred around higher power or deity. India is known for its religious diversity with Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Sikhism, Buddhism and Jainism being the major religions. Religion often shapes cultural practices, festivals and deity hopes and even marriage choices.

3. Caste in India is a traditional social hierarchy especially associated with Hindu society, though its influence is felt across other communities too. It divides people into hereditary groups based on occupation and social status, the four main Varnas being, the Brahmins (priests, scholars); Kshatriyas (warriors, rulers); Vaishyas (traders, merchants) and Shudras (labourers, service providers). Apart from these, there are Scheduled Castes (Dalits), Scheduled Tribes and historically marginalized groups, who have been subjected to discrimination.

4. While the Constitution of India prohibits caste based discrimination, caste and religion still play a significant role in social life, politics, education and employment through reservation policies.

5. Article 25 of the Constitution of India guarantees the freedom of religion to all individuals, by holding that every person has the right to freely profess, practice and propagate their religion. The key features envisaged in Article 25, in other words, is that the individuals can choose their own religious belief, publicly declare one's religion, perform religious rituals and customs and share one's religious beliefs. However, the freedom under Article 25 of Constitution of India is not absolute, but subject to public order, morality, health and other provisions relating to functional rights. The State can regulate or restrict economic, political or secular activities associated with religious practices. The State can also make laws for social welfare and reforms, even if they interfere with religious practices like abolition of untouchability and animal sacrifice. Thus, the State would be under a Constitutional obligation to implement the intention and object of Article 25 in general and for the purpose of this case, recognize the freedom of conscience of an individual to choose their own religious beliefs.

6. The appellant herein is married to one D.Suganya and is having two children, namely S.Ranadhira Viyash and S.Devadikshya. In an affidavit filed before us, he had declared that he intends to raise his children in a casteless and religion free society. He had further declared that he had never claimed any benefit from the Government under caste or religious reservation and neither does he intend to claim any benef

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top