IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SIDDHARTHA VARMA, AJIT SINGH, JJ.
Raj Mangal Gond – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. And 3 Others – Respondents
Writ-C No.23865, 23942, 26680, 25749 of 2022
Decided on : 05-12-2022
Caste Certificate - Scheduled Tribe - Article 342(2) - Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Orders (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Government Order dated 28.02.2011 - 2011(1) ADJ 440 (DB), Hizwana Bano vs. State of U.P. and Others, 2014(8) ADJ 690 (DB), Praveen Kumar vs. State of U.P. and Others and 2015(8)ADJ 275 (DB), Rajesh Kumar Gond vs. State of U.P. and others
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner claimed to be a Gond with a permanent domicile of Village Kasamriya, District Maharajganj and had a Caste Certificate of being a Scheduled Caste. The petitioner applied for a Scheduled Tribe certificate after the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Orders (Amendment) Act, 2002 considered Gond Caste to be of the Scheduled Tribe. The Tehsildar issued a Caste Certificate to the petitioner indicating that the petitioner was of the Scheduled Tribe. Subsequently, the petitioner applied for an online Caste Certificate, which was rejected, leading to a writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The Tehsildar, who had earlier issued a certificate, could not enter into the merits of the matter when issuing a fresh certificate 'On-line'. The jurisdiction to verify the Caste Certificate lay with the Caste Scrutiny Committee under the Government Order dated 28.02.2011. The impugned order canceling the Caste Certificate was quashed and set aside.
Issues: Validity of the Tehsildar's jurisdiction to cancel the Caste Certificate and issue a fresh certificate 'On-line'.
Ratio Decidendi: The Tehsildar had no jurisdiction to cancel the Caste Certificate except when obtained by fraud or by concealing any relevant fact. The authority to verify the Caste Certificate lay with the Caste Scrutiny Committee under the Government Order dated 28.02.2011.
Final Decision: The impugned order canceling the Caste Certificate was quashed and set aside. The Tehsildar was directed to issue the 'Online' Certificate forthwith and to refer the matter to the District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee if there were doubts about the petitioner's caste or tribe.
JUDGMENT :
Siddhartha Varma, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
1. The petitioner who claimed himself to be a Gond with a permanent domicile of Village Kasamriya, District Maharajganj had a Caste Certificate of being a Scheduled Caste which was dated 6.6.1996. However, when the parliament in the exercise of its power under Article 342(2) of the Constitution of India brought the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Orders (Amendment) Act, 2002 and had considered Gond Caste residing in the District Maharajganj to be of the Scheduled Tribe, the petitioner again applied for a certificate holding that the petitioner was of the Scheduled Tribe. When the Tehsildar who was adjudicating the matter held that the petitioner was not of the Gond Caste but was of the Kahar caste, the petitioner challenged the matter before the District level Caste Scrutiny Committee, Maharajganj. On 04.10.2014 the District level Caste Scrutiny Committee, Maharajganj remitted the matter back to the Tehsildar for examining the evidence and directed him to reconsider the evidence and thereafter to issue the Caste Certificate in accordance with law. On 27.11.2014, the Tehsildar issued a Caste Certificate to the petitioner which indicated that the petitioner was of the Scheduled Tribe. The Caste Certificate according to the petitioner which was issued on 27.11.2014 was a certificate, which was issued by hand and since there were subsequent Government Orders which desired that a candidate had to have a Caste Certificate “Online” the petitioner applied again for the issuing of a Caste Certificate “On-line”. The petitioner alongwith certain other individuals who were also of the Scheduled Tribe applied for the issuing of the Caste Certificate On-line. The applications, however, were rejected in a mechanical manner and, therefore, the petitioner along with certain other individuals filed a writ petition being Writ-C No. 15552 of 2020 (Anoop Kumar Gond and 70 Others vs. State of U.P. and 4 Others), which was disposed of on 12.10.2020 with the following order:-
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to take into consideration the Census-1891 for issuance of Scheduled Tribe certificate to the petitioners."
Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the petitioners have filed applications before the concerned Tehsildars for issuance of Caste Certificates but till date no order has been passed.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we grant liberty to the petitioners to make a comprehensive representation before the respondent-Tehsildars for passing appropriate orders on their applications filed for issuance of Caste Certificates within two weeks from today along with a copy of this order enclosing therewith a copy of the writ petition and its annexures and, if any such representation is made, the said authority shall make all endeavour to consider and pass appropriate orders on the same in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within 60 days from the date of receipt of the said representation.
The writ petition stands disposed of. ”
2. Thereafter, in pursuance of the High Court's order, the impugned order dated 26.2.2021 was passed by the Tehsildar-Sadar, District Maharajganj. His order has been based on a certain enquiry report of the revenue authorities. Since the orders of the Tehsildar had rejected the claim of the petitioner to be declared as a Gond, which was Scheduled Tribe and he had in fact considered him as “Kahar”, the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that when earlier the Tehsildar on 27.11.2014 had already passed an order to the ef
The authority to verify Caste Certificates and the jurisdiction to cancel or issue fresh certificates lies with the Caste Scrutiny Committee under the Government Order dated 28.02.2011, unless obtain....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the authority's requirement to take a prima facie view at the time of issuance of tribe/caste certificate, followed by scrutiny by the Scheduled Tr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court emphasized the importance of availing alternative remedies provided under the Act before approaching the court for redressal.
The validity of caste certificates must be examined by a Caste Scrutiny Committee, as per Supreme Court guidelines, regardless of the individual's employment status.
The authorities exceeded their jurisdiction in denying caste certificates, improperly evaluating the validity of caste claims contrary to statutory provisions.
The validity of caste certificates must be assessed by Caste Scrutiny Committees as established by Supreme Court guidelines, rendering direct cancellations by magistrates unsustainable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.