IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.Sakthivel
S.Thangarasu Pillai – Appellant
Versus
S.Arumugam Pillai (Died) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.Sakthivel, J.
This Second Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated December 12, 2019 passed in A.S.No.69 of 2014 by the 'Principal District Court, Ariyalur' [henceforth 'First Appellate Court' for the sake of brevity and convenience] reversing the Judgment and Decree dated October 27, 2006 passed in O.S.No.65 of 2004 by the 'Subordinate Court, Ariyalur' [henceforth 'Trial Court'].
2. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties will be referred to as per their array in the Original Suit.
PLAINTIFF'S CASE
3. The plaintiff is the elder brother of the 1st defendant. The 2nd and 3rd defendants are the sisters of the plaintiff and the 1st defendant. The plaintiff worked as an Engineer in several places in the State of Tamil Nadu and he retired from service in 1993. Thereafter, he is residing along with his son at Pennadam. The 1st defendant who is the younger brother of the plaintiff was living along with his father Subbaraya Pillai in the native village - Sendurai and he has been employed as a Village Administrative Officer. The 2nd and 3rd defendants / sisters are already married.
3.1. Late Subbaraya Pillai is the father of the plaintiff and defendants






Kale Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation
Ravinder Kaur Grewal Vs. Manjit Kaur
Ripudaman Singh Vs. Tikka Maheshwar Chand
Yellapu Uma Maheswari Vs. Buddha Jagadheeswararao
A.C.Lakshmipathy Vs. A.M.Chakrapani Reddiar
S.Thirumalai Vs. S.Govindarajan (Died)
Chinnappareddigari Pedda Muthylareddy Vs. Chinnappareddigari Venkatareddy
Korukonda Chalapathi Rao Vs. Korukonda Annapurna Sampath Kumar
A partition agreement requires registration if it creates rights; a document lacking registration cannot substantiate a partition despite acknowledgments.
Oral partitions, while valid, must be substantiated by evidence, and unregistered documents regarding such partitions are inadmissible in court; res judicata applies to suits dismissed for default wi....
The court reaffirmed that for a valid partition among joint family properties, proper registration and absence of fraud are crucial, emphasizing joint possession and familial rights.
The burden of proof for claims of oral partition lies with the party asserting it, and failure to establish legal ownership results in dismissal of the suit.
Rule 73 of Rules reads as duties of Registering Officer.
A Second Appeal lacks merit if it raises factual disputes already resolved by lower courts and does not present a substantial question of law.
In a partition suit, all legal heirs must be parties, and failing to prove a settlement deed invalidates claims to partition. The court upheld the necessity for complete participation of all heirs in....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for compulsory registration of family settlement documents under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908, and the inadmissib....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.