SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2299

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR
B. Venkatesan – Appellant
Versus
S. Peter Devadass (Deceased) – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : T. Jayanthi
For the Respondent: N. Manikandan

ORDER :

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

1. Challenge has been made to the order dismissing the Execution Petition, the present revision has been filed.

2. The petitioner/plaintiff has filed a suit in O.S.No.6221/2021 on the file of XXIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai for recovery of money for a sum of Rs.8,90,000/- together with interest at the rate of 24% per annum. The suit has been decreed ex parte on 18.11.2021. Execution Petition was filed in E.P.No.686 of 2022, only in EP proceedings, notices were ordered to Judgment Debtor and it came to the notice of the Court that the judgment debtor died on 15.10.2021, even before the judgment and decree passed against the judgment debtor. Thereafter, the death certificate is also produced by the Court Amin. Subsequently, an application under Order XXII Rule 4 of CPC was also filed by the decree holder for impleading the legal heirs of the deceased judgment debtor, though the legal heirs received notice, they have not appeared before the Court and they were set exparte. Further, the Executing Court found that as the decree is passed against the deceased is not enforceable, accordingly, the E.P.686/2022 was dismissed on 24.08.2022. Challeng

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top