SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4690

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
B.Renushree – Appellant
Versus
G.Karthikeyan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.S.Namasivayam
For the Respondent: Mr.M.Guruprasad

ORDER :

This civil revision petition seeks to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.130 of 2020 on the file of the learned I Additional District Court at Erode. The civil revision petitioner is the first defendant in the suit.

2. O.S.No.130 of 2020 has been presented for the following reliefs:

“a. To declare that the decree passed in counter claim in O.S.No.262/2009 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Erode in favour of the 1st defendant is null and void, fraudulent, collusive, invalid and not binding on the plaintiff.

b. for permanent injunction restraining the 1st defendant her men, assigns, agents etc., from in any manner proceeding with or enforcing the impugned exparte counter claim decree passed in O.S.No.262 of 2009 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Erode in EP.No.12 of 2014 on the file of the II Additional District Court, Erode.”

There is a history behind the present suit:

3. The civil revision petitioner B.Ranushree had purchased the suit schedule mentioned property by way of a registered sale deed in Document no.513 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Registrar, Erode. On the very day, she executed a power of attorney in favour of her father one T.N.Balakrishna

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top