IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM AND V.SIVAGNANAM, JJ.
Binojyakka - Petitioner
Versus
State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station – Respondent
Crl.A.No.1060 of 2022
Decided on : 03-10-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction and sentencing of accused under ipc (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details of occurrence and eyewitness accounts (Para 5 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. details surrounding the altercation leading to the deceased's death. (Para 7) |
| 4. investigation process and evidence gathered. (Para 12) |
| 5. arguments from both parties regarding evidence (Para 15) |
| 6. court’s analysis on the prosecution's evidence and intent (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. modification of conviction and sentence by the court (Para 24 , 25) |
ORDER :
V. SIVAGNANAM, J.
The appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 12.03.2021 passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge Court, Coimbatore in SC.No.132 of 2019.
2. The appellant/accused was charged and prosecuted under Section 302 IPC by the Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station in Crime No.45 of 2019.
3. To prove the prosecution case, prosecution has examined 13 witnesses, PW 1 to PW13, and marked 13 documents Ex.A.1 to Ex.A.13. Besides, one material object MO.1 is marked. Incriminating prosecution witnesses explained to the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. He denied them as false. Further, the accused has not examined any witnesses nor exhibited any documents.
4. After considering the evidence and documents, the Trial Court convicted and sentenced the appellant for the offences under Section 302 IPC and was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months.
5. The prosecution case is that the deceased Sivasamy was residing at Senkattuthottam, Ganesapuram in Annur Police Station limits in Coimbatore District. The accused Binojyakka, belonging to Kunthura Village in Koraput District in Odisha State, had come to Coimbatore District with his friends and was searching for employment. On 31.01.2019 the accused went to Ganesapuram to seek employment and trespassed into the gardens of the said Sivasamy.
and hit Sivasamy repeatedly with the said weapon on his head and back. Sivasamy fell down unconsciously.7. PW1/Chelladurai took Sivasamy in his Omni car to Kovai Medical Centre Hospital, Kovilpalayam at 7.05 A.M, PW6/Dr.Vishnupriya examined Sivasamy and declared that he was already dead. She issued Ex.P.6 Accident Register copy and Ex.P.7 Death Intimation. Meanwhile while he was chased from the scene of occurrence by witnesses, the accused fell down and sustained injuries. He was admitted at Annur Government Hospital at 7.50 A.M by PW2 Shanmugasundaram and PW4 Moona @ Sithender Bagh. PW8/Dr.Kannan examined the accused for the injuries and issued Ex.P.10 Accident Register copy.
8. PW1/Chelladurai appeared at Annur Police Station on the same day at 8.30 A.M and gave Ex.P.1 written complaint. Sivasamy, Sub Inspector of Police received it and registered Ex.P.11 FIR in Cr.No.45 of 2019 under Section 302 IPC against the accused Binojyakka. PW12/Venkatesan, the Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station took up the investigation.
9. During investigation, PW12 visited the scene of occurrence on the same day at 9.15 A.M in the presence of PW7/Muthusamy and Selvaraj and prepared Ex.P.12 rough sketch and Ex.P.8 observation mahazar. He examined witnesses. He seized MO.1 coconut fiber under Ex.P.9 recovery mahazar at 10.15 A.M from the scene of occurrence. He held inquest over t



Conviction altered from Section 302 IPC to Section 304(2) IPC due to lack of evidence for premeditation or intent, resulting in reduced sentence.
The court determined the absence of intent in the accused's actions, modifying the conviction from murder (Section 302 IPC) to causing grievous hurt (Section 326 IPC).
Intent or knowledge to cause death required for murder under Section 302 IPC not established; case qualified under Section 326 IPC.
The court modified the conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to causing grievous hurt under Section 326 IPC, finding no intent to kill.
The court established that sudden provocation can reduce a murder charge to manslaughter, particularly in domestic disputes.
The court established that the conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder is justified when intent to kill is not proven, relying on witness credibility and evidential discrepancies.
Alteration of conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to lack of premeditation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on direct evidence, including the testimony of the injured eye witness and medical evidence, to establish the guilt of the accused bey....
It is the quality and not the quantity which determines the adequacy of evidence. Evidence has to be weighed not counted.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.