SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2398

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM AND V.SIVAGNANAM, JJ.
Binojyakka - Petitioner
Versus
State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station – Respondent 
Crl.A.No.1060 of 2022 
Decided on : 03-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.R.Sankarasubbu
For the Respondent: Mr.S.Raja Kumar

Conviction altered from Section 302 IPC to Section 304(2) IPC due to lack of evidence for premeditation or intent, resulting in reduced sentence.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 302 and Section 304(2) - Conviction for murder - Appeal against conviction under Section 302 IPC - Findings revealed insufficient evidence of motive or pre-meditation - Court found that the assault was on a spur of the moment with non-deadly weapon - Conviction altered from Section 302 IPC to Section 304(2) IPC - Sentence reduced from life imprisonment to 5 ½ years rigorous imprisonment. (Paras 24, 25)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 313 - Accused denied incriminating evidence - No witnesses from the defense presented, impeding the argument against the prosecution's evidence. (Paras 3, 14)

Facts of the case:
The appellant, charged under Section 302 IPC, was accused of killing Sivasamy during an altercation when the deceased confronted him for trespassing, resulting in the deceased being struck with a coconut fiber.

Issues: The court addressed whether the evidence substantiated the serious offense under Section 302 IPC or could support a lesser charge, as well as the evidential reliability of eye-witnesses.

Findings of Court:
Conviction exists for causing death but lacks evidence for intent to kill, thereby merits a lesser charge under Section 304(2) IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled on the absence of premeditation and intent to kill based on the manner in which injuries were caused and the nature of the weapon, indicating a case of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Result: Conviction altered to Section 304(2) IPC, with a sentence of 5 ½ years of rigorous imprisonment, fine confirmed.

Table of Content
1. conviction and sentencing of accused under ipc (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. details of occurrence and eyewitness accounts (Para 5 , 8 , 10)
3. details surrounding the altercation leading to the deceased's death. (Para 7)
4. investigation process and evidence gathered. (Para 12)
5. arguments from both parties regarding evidence (Para 15)
6. court’s analysis on the prosecution's evidence and intent (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
7. modification of conviction and sentence by the court (Para 24 , 25)

ORDER :

V. SIVAGNANAM, J.

The appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 12.03.2021 passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge Court, Coimbatore in SC.No.132 of 2019.

2. The appellant/accused was charged and prosecuted under Section 302 IPC by the Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station in Crime No.45 of 2019.

3. To prove the prosecution case, prosecution has examined 13 witnesses, PW 1 to PW13, and marked 13 documents Ex.A.1 to Ex.A.13. Besides, one material object MO.1 is marked. Incriminating prosecution witnesses explained to the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. He denied them as false. Further, the accused has not examined any witnesses nor exhibited any documents.

4. After considering the evidence and documents, the Trial Court convicted and sentenced the appellant for the offences under Section 302 IPC and was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months.

5. The prosecution case is that the deceased Sivasamy was residing at Senkattuthottam, Ganesapuram in Annur Police Station limits in Coimbatore District. The accused Binojyakka, belonging to Kunthura Village in Koraput District in Odisha State, had come to Coimbatore District with his friends and was searching for employment. On 31.01.2019 the accused went to Ganesapuram to seek employment and trespassed into the gardens of the said Sivasamy.

6. On 31.01.2019 at about 6.00 A.M, Sivasamy (since deceased) with witnesses PW1/Chelladurai, PW2/Shanmugasundaram and Karunakaran completed walking and was consuming tea in front of his house at his garden. On noticing the entry of the accused into the said garden, Sivasamy questioned him who was he and why did he come there. The accused gave some reply in Hindi. Sivasamy asked the accused to go out of the place. But the accused did not move. Hence Sivasamy took him to Kovai to Sathiyamangalam Main Road, left him and was returning to his house on the mud Road. At that time the accused, with the intention of committing the murder of Sivasamy, picked up a coconut fiber and hit Sivasamy repeatedly with the said weapon on his head and back. Sivasamy fell down unconsciously.

7. PW1/Chelladurai took Sivasamy in his Omni car to Kovai Medical Centre Hospital, Kovilpalayam at 7.05 A.M, PW6/Dr.Vishnupriya examined Sivasamy and declared that he was already dead. She issued Ex.P.6 Accident Register copy and Ex.P.7 Death Intimation. Meanwhile while he was chased from the scene of occurrence by witnesses, the accused fell down and sustained injuries. He was admitted at Annur Government Hospital at 7.50 A.M by PW2 Shanmugasundaram and PW4 Moona @ Sithender Bagh. PW8/Dr.Kannan examined the accused for the injuries and issued Ex.P.10 Accident Register copy.

8. PW1/Chelladurai appeared at Annur Police Station on the same day at 8.30 A.M and gave Ex.P.1 written complaint. Sivasamy, Sub Inspector of Police received it and registered Ex.P.11 FIR in Cr.No.45 of 2019 under Section 302 IPC against the accused Binojyakka. PW12/Venkatesan, the Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station took up the investigation.

9. During investigation, PW12 visited the scene of occurrence on the same day at 9.15 A.M in the presence of PW7/Muthusamy and Selvaraj and prepared Ex.P.12 rough sketch and Ex.P.8 observation mahazar. He examined witnesses. He seized MO.1 coconut fiber under Ex.P.9 recovery mahazar at 10.15 A.M from the scene of occurrence. He held inquest over t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top