SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2409

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
J.NISHA BANU, J.
Mohammed Shahid S/o Mohammed Isaaq - Petitioner
Vs
Lenin, S/o Dhatchanmoorthy - Respondent 
C.R.P.No.10 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.82 of 2022
Decided On : 03-06-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.S.Kumaradevan
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Rajamakesh

Disputes regarding Wakf property must be addressed solely by a Wakf Tribunal, not by civil courts, as observed under Section 85 of the Wakf Act, reinforcing prior court rulings.

Headnote:(A) Waqf Act, 1995 - Section 85 - Jurisdiction of civil courts - Civil Revision Petition filed to strike out the plaint for a suit pertaining to Wakf property - The court held that issues regarding Wakf property must be determined by a Wakf Tribunal, not civil courts, reinforcing existing case law and statutory provisions. (Paras 1, 3-15)

(B) Concurrent findings - Previous judgments confirm ownership and rights over the Wakf property; the court emphasized adherence to the directive that disputes over Wakf properties fall under the tribunal's jurisdiction. (Paras 5-10)

(C) Legal proceedings - The 1st respondent's actions were in reference to claimed ownership under lease agreements which were dismissed; jurisdictional questions overruled by the Wakf Act. (Paras 11-14)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to strike out a plaint regarding property owned by a Wakf, arguing that it falls under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Wakf Tribunal as established by previous judgments. The dispute involves rights claimed by various parties and previous court rulings affirming the Wakf's ownership.

Findings of Court:
The plaint was struck off, affirming that the issue is exclusively for the Wakf Tribunal to adjudicate as per statutory authority.

Issues: The main issues included whether the civil court could entertain a suit over Wakf property and if the 1st respondent had legal standing to file the suit.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that jurisdiction lies solely with the Wakf Tribunal for disputes involving Wakf properties, as mandated by applicable law.

Result: Civil Revision Petition allowed, plaint struck off.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case involving wakf property. (Para 1 , 2)
2. parties' arguments regarding property ownership and court jurisdiction. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's analysis of jurisdiction under the wakf act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. previous litigations establishing ramzan thaikka wakf's ownership. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
5. interpretation of sections of the wakf act related to jurisdiction. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. conclusion striking down the plaint for lack of jurisdiction. (Para 15)

ORDER :

J. NISHA BANU, J.

1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to strike out the plaint in O.S.No.54 of 2021 dated 04.09.2021 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kattumannarkoil and further, direct the lower court to delete the above suit from the suit register.

2. The brief case of the petitioner is as follows:

(i) The petitioner is the muthavalli of Ramzan Thaikka Wakf and the Wakf is a notified one as per the WAKF ACT on 06.05.1959 and the main object of the Wakf is pious, religious and charitable. The property in Survey No.103/, 2, 3 admeasuring about total extent of 9.60 acre/cents situated at Udayargudi Village, Kattumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore District, has been granted to one Ramzanasha in order to maintain the Thaikka and chavadi and the said grant was confirmed under R.O.No.1107 of Udayarkudi village by the Inam Commissioner on 08.10.1861. The Thaikka came to be known as Ramzansha Thaikka. Ramazansha and his descendants were in possession and enjoyment of the above said property only in the capacity as muthavallies and for maintaining the said Thaikkas and chavadi.

(ii) Originally, some third persons including the 5th respondent were applying for patta in respect of the above survey number before Inam Abolition Tribunal, Cuddalore in I.A.T.No.6 of 1983 and Ramzan Thaikka Waqf filed a implead petition before Inam Abolition Tribunal, Cuddalore but the Settlement Officer dismissed the implead petition. Hence, Ramzan Thaikka Wakf preferred an appeal against the said order passed by the Tribunal in I.A.T.No.6 of 1983 and sought for recovery of possession in STA No.10 of 1989 before this Court and the other encroacher/third party filed appeal before this Court in S.A.Nos.1466 to 1468 of 1992 against the judgment passed in O.S.Nos.710, 711, 712 of 1986 which was filed by Ramzan Thaikka Wakf against the third parties for recovery of possession including the 5th respondent and this Court, passed a detailed judgment giving findings that Ramzan Thaikka Wakf is the owner of the above said property and entitled to recovery of possession and dismissed all the second appeals filed by the encroachers by order dated 30.01.1997. Thereafter, the petitioner therein filed three execution petitions in E.P.No.8 &9 of 2000 and 16 of 2001 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kattumannarkoil for taking possession from the 5th respondent herein. On 17.11.2003, the suit property was handed over to muthawalli of Ramzan Thaikka Wakf. Till date, the above said property is a vacant land and there is lot of bushes and wastage in that property.

(iii) One Wadhooth Khan had filed O.S.No.55 of 2009 on the file of Wakf Tribunal, Principal Sub Court) at Cuddalore against the Ramzan Thaikka Mosque, to declare the above said property in favour of Periyapallivasal @ Udayargudi Mosque restraining the respondents from dealing with or interfering with the right, title, interest possession and enjoyment of the said property. The said suit was dismissed by judgment and decree dated 0404.2012. Challenging the same, the plaintiffs therein filed C.R.P.No.2839 of 2012 before this Court and the same was dismissed by this Court by order dated 29.09.2021 confirming that the above property belongs to Ramzan Thaikka Mosque.

(iv) On 26.10.2021, one Wadhooth Khan (petitioner in the above CRP.No.2839/2012) and his men tried to enter into the property and threatened the petitioner herein to vacate the place. Hence, the petitioner gave compl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top