BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.SRIMATHY, J.
Congress Ponvizha Mandapam Trust, Through its Managing Trustee, S.Gopal - Appellant
Versus
P.Veldurai - Respondent
A.S.(MD)No.161 of 2019
Decided on : 16-12-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the trust and parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. defendants argue legal standing and issues. (Para 7) |
| 3. trial court's issues and proceedings. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court analysis on necessity of permission. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. trust as a separate legal entity. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. plaintiffs' responsibilities and court observations. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 7. final judgment and decree. (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT :
S. SRIMATHY, J.
The present First Appeal is filed by plaintiffs against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.10.2018 passed in O.S.No.65 of 2017 on the file of the 3rd Additional District Court, Tirunelveli.
2. The plaintiffs are the appellants herein and the defendants are the respondents herein. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred as plaintiffs and defendants as per the ranking in the suit.
3. The suit is filed by the plaintiffs for (a) declaring that the persons mentioned in the 1st schedule to this plaint are the Trustees of the 1st plaintiff Trust, (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, servants, agents etc., from in any manner disturbing the persons mentioned in the 1st schedule to the plaintiff in any way from enjoying possession and managing the property of the 1st plaintiff Trust more particularly described as schedule 2 herein.
4. The brief facts as stated by the plaintiffs are that the property in the 2nd schedule of the plaint consisting of building absolutely belongs to the first plaintiff Trust. The plaintiff trust was created by three Congress Martyrs viz., 1. Gomathi Sankara Diksthadar, 2. Marimuthu Konar, 3. K.N.Harihara Iyer. As founder Trustees they have executed a registered Deed of Trust dated 20.10.1954 in Document No.2499 of 1954. One of the founder Trustees namely Marimuthu Konar died in the year 1955 and another founder Trustee Gomathi Sankara Diksthadar died in the year 1971. Then surviving founder trustee K.N.Harihara Iyer appointed K.V.Subramanian son of Veeraputhira Moopanar and M.P.Swamy son of Pothikasala Thevar in the place of the deceased founder trustees by exercising the power granted under the Trust Deed for appointing trustees. While so, the said K.V.Subramanian and the founder Trustee K.N.Harihara Iyer resigned the Trusteeship on 02.10.1988 and 01.08.1991 respectively. The only remaining Trustee, M.P.Swamy appointed Sangamuthu Thevar and Ilayaperumal as Trustees in the place of the resigned Trustees K.V.Subramanian and K.N.Harihara Iyer and he has executed a “Deed of Trust” to that effect on 10.06.1992. While so, the said M.P.Swamy and Ilayaperumal died, then the only surviving Trustee Sangamuthu Thevar appointed S.Gopal (the 2nd plaintiff), Dr.Neelakanda Iyer, T.S.R. Venkatramana and Gomathinayagam as Trustees to the 1st plaintiff Trust and to that effect the said Sangamuthu Thevar executed a Deed dated 27.10.2014. The Trustees S.Gopal, K.Neelakandan, T.S.R.Venkatramana and Gomathinayagam have been managing the Trust and they were in possession and enjoyment of the 2nd schedule property in their capacity as Trustees to the 1st plaintiff Trust. The 2nd plaintiff as a Managing Trustee with the consultation of other Trustees executed a Deed dated 22.06.2015 and it makes it clear that the Trustees were the 2nd plaintiff Gopal, Gamathinayagam, Venkatramana and Dr.Neelakandan. Subsequently, the 2nd plaintiff S.Gopal in his capacity as a Managing Trustee to the 1st plaintiff Trust in consultation with other Trustees appointed S.Valli daughter of Sangamuthu Thevar as one of the Trustees in addition to the existing Trustees as above mentioned by a deed dated 17.03.2017. Hence, the present Trustees of the first plaintiff Trust are as given below and their names are given in the 1st schedule to the plaint:
1. S.Gopal
2. Gamathinayagam
3. T.S.R.Venkatramana
4. Dr.Neelakandan
5. S.Valli
5.(i) The 2nd plaintiff Gopal, as already mentioned is a Managing Trustee to the first plaintiff Trust. He is a member in the Indian Nat
The Trust possesses a distinct legal identity separate from its founders, exempting it from unauthorized claims of trusteeship from third parties, as affirmed under Section 92 of CPC.
The court established that for a suit under Section 92 of the CPC, it is essential to demonstrate a public charitable trust, a breach of trust, and appropriate relief sought, emphasizing the protecti....
A suit under Section 92 of CPC must serve public interest and establish breach of trust; claims of personal grievances cannot sustain such suits.
Point of Law : Where the allegation of breach of trust, direction for administration of Trust is absent, the suit is maintainable and obtaining leave under Section 92 of the CPC is not necessary.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to file an application under Section 92 C.P.C. for managing public trusts involving public charity, and the necessity to implead th....
The court affirmed that resolutions affecting individual trustee rights are not governed by Section 92 of the CPC, allowing the plaintiff's suit for reinstatement as valid despite the First Appellate....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.