Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Anita Sumanth
Deepak – Appellant
Versus
Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek admission under rte act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioners rely on prior court decisions. (Para 5) |
| 3. court seeks further details on admissions. (Para 6) |
| 4. multiple applications are permissible. (Para 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 5. distance requirement under rte is flexible. (Para 8 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. distance criteria can be flexible where vacancies exist. (Para 10) |
| 7. vacancies justify admissions beyond distance. (Para 14 , 16 , 18) |
| 8. rte applies to kindergarten education. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. mandamus issued for child admissions. (Para 22) |
| 10. writ petitions allowed without costs. (Para 23) |
ORDER :
Anita Sumanth, J.
1. The petitioner in W.P.No.14910 of 2024 is the father of one D.Lidharshana and the petitioner is W.P.No.14913 of 2024 is the father of one Sinamika Elango. Lidharshana and Sinamika are referred to as 'child' or collectively, as 'children'. They seek a mandamus directing the respondents, being the authorities of the Education Department of the State of Tamil Nadu/R1 to R3, and R4, being N.G.R.A. Nursery and Primary School, Coimbatore (W.P.No.14910 of 2024) and Kalaivani Matriculation School, Coimbatore (W.P.No.14913 of 2024) to admit the children to Lower K
The criteria for admission under the RTE Act is not rigid; schools must admit eligible children even if they reside beyond prescribed distances, provided vacancies exist.
The Right to Education Act mandates flexible application of distance criteria to ensure access to education for all eligible children.
The Right to Education Act aims to ensure educational access for underprivileged children, and rigid adherence to distance criteria that denies admission contradicts this purpose.
The Amendment Rules exempting private unaided schools from admitting 25% disadvantaged children based on proximity to government schools violate the RTE Act and Article 21-A, as they impose condition....
The right to education under the RTE Act does not guarantee admission to a specific school, and residency criteria based on wards must be clarified by the State.
The judgment establishes that executive actions must comply with statutory mandates, particularly in education, and emphasizes the importance of the neighborhood principle in school admissions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
