SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2500

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
Anindya Dutta, Son of Anup Kumar dutta - Appellant 
Versus
The Deputy Director – IV (i/c), Industrial Safety and Health - Respondent 
Crl.O.P.Nos.14351, 14354, 14359, 14362 & 14366 of 2024 & Crl.M.P.Nos.8798 to 8800, 8796 & 8794 of 2024
Decided on : 12-08-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Arun Anbumani, for Mr.S.M.Vivek Anandh
For the Respondent:Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Establishments registered under the Tamil Nadu Catering Establishments Act are exempt from the Factories Act, as per Section 30, and the nature of activity determines legislative applicability.

Headnote:(A) Factories Act, 1948 - Section 2(m), Tamil Nadu Catering Establishments Act, 1958 - Section 2(1) and Section 30 - Quashing of complaints for alleged violations of the Factories Act - Petitioner establishment registered under the Catering Establishments Act, exempt from the purview of the Factories Act, hence complaints quashed - The nature of activity, rather than the place of food consumption, determines the applicability of the relevant legislation. (Paras 6, 18, 28, 30)

(B) Jurisdiction to inspect - The authorities of the Deputy Director of Industrial Safety and Health lacked jurisdiction to inspect the petitioner's premises as it falls under the definition of 'Catering Establishment' exempting it from the Factories Act. (Paras 9, 28)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner operated a centralized kitchen catering to various residential accommodations, holding valid registration under the Tamil Nadu Catering Establishments Act, exempting it from the regulations of the Factories Act. Complaints were filed against the petitioner for violations under the Factories Act despite having a license under special legislation.

Findings of Court:
The court held that the premises is a Catering Establishment, therefore, the complaints were quashed due to lack of jurisdiction of the inspecting authority under the Factories Act.

Issues: The main issues involved determination of jurisdiction of the authorities over establishments registered under special legislation, and the application of the Factories Act to a centralized kitchen setup.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the Catering Establishments Act specifically excludes its registered establishments from the application of the Factories Act, reinforcing that the nature of activity (food manufacturing for immediate consumption) is pivotal for determining applicable regulations.

Result: Criminal Original Petitions allowed, and the complaints quashed.

Table of Content
1. complaint details for violations of factories act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. argument regarding exemption under catering establishments act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. dispute regarding factory definition and application. (Para 8 , 10 , 14)
4. discussion on jurisdiction and nature of establishments. (Para 12)
5. court's observation on adherence to special legislation. (Para 21 , 28)
6. catering establishments act's specificity overrides factory act. (Para 24 , 26 , 27)
7. court quashes complaints based on jurisdiction issues. (Para 29 , 31)

ORDER :

G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.

These Criminal Original Petitions to quash the complaint filed by the Deputy Director-IV, Industrial Safety and Health, Guindy, Chennai, for violation of FACTORIES ACT .

2. Gist of the complaint:-

On 22/09/2023, the premises situated at SLC MAA, Guindy Kitchen, G.R. Enclave No:2/1, Dhanakodiraja Street, Ekkattuthangal, Chennai was inspected by the Officials of Industrial Safety and Health Department and noticed that the premises is used as a ‘Factory’ by the Occupier-cum-Manager, wherein manufacturing of food being carried out by engaging 14 workers and using 23.75 HP machines without permission of the Director of Industrial Safety and Health. A show cause notice dated 19/10/2023 was sent to the Occupier-cum-Manager providing the details of 9 contraventions of the FACTORIES ACT noticed during the inspection and called for explanation. In response to the Show Cause Notice (SCN), reply dated 07/11/2023 was sent stating that the Establishment is duly registered under the TAMIL NADU CATERING ESTABLISHMENTS ACT , 1958. As per Section 30 of the Tamil Nadu Catering Establishment Act, the provisions of The FACTORIES ACT , 1948 will not apply to its establishment. Not being satisfied with the said reply, five complaints presented before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore against Thiru.Anindya Dutta, the petitioner herein as Occupier-Cum-Manager of DTwelve Space (P) Ltd for the alleged contraventions of:-

(i)Section 6(1)(a)(aa)(b)(c) r/w Rule 3(1)(2) Section 6(1)(d) Rules 4(1)(2)(3) Section 7(1) Rule 12
(ii)Section 6(1)(9) r/w Rule 79 Section 45(1) r/w Rule 63
(iii)Section 45(3) r/w Rule 63-B Section 38 r/w Rule 61(10)(f)
(iv)Section 3 r/w Rule 3(1)(2)
(v)Section 4(1)(b)(i)

3. The Learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore taken the five complaints on file as C.C.Nos.340/2024, 341/2024, 342/2024, 343/2024 and 344/2024 and caused summons to the petitioner.

4. Gist of the quash petition:-

(i) The Petitioner company is engaged in the business of running, managing and operating the day-today affairs of residential premises, and license/sub-licenses such residential premises to individuals (including students and working professionals) for the purpose of long-stay accommodation. Over a period, it has acquired an immense reputation for the quality of services it provides. For those living in the accommodation spaces run by the Petitioner Company, it provides meals as well. Since, there are multiple accommodation facilities that are run by the Company within the same city, for achieving operational efficiency, a common centralized kitchen was established by the Company to serve meals to all those people residing in its facilities. This facility was established and became operational in March 2023.

(ii) The Petitioner being an establishment, which falls under the definition of 'Catering Establishment' as per Section 2(1) of TAMIL NADU CATERING ESTABLISHMENTS ACT , 1958, filed application for license and registration for its operation under the Act on 13.06.2023 by the Petitioner Company. This application was allowed by the relevant authority on 20.10.2023 and this application was allowed by the relevant authority on 20.10.2023 was made applicable for the whole year of 2023, ending on 31.12.2023. Subsequently, for the year 2024, a fresh application was made in the month 25.02.2024, which was allowed on 27.02.2024. This renewed license is valid till 31.12.2024.

(iii) The petitioner’s e



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top