BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Ponni Delta Retirement Community – Appellant
Versus
Akham Finvest Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved in the arbitration (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. existence of arbitration clause (Para 4) |
| 3. judicial interference in arbitration (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. arguments for and against arbitration (Para 6) |
| 5. final decision on civil revision petition (Para 8) |
ORDER :
D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
A. The Civil Revision Petition:
1. The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 29.03.2021 made in I.A.No.04 of 2021 in O.S.No.24 of 2021 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Srirangam. By the said order, the trial Court dismissed the interlocutory application filed by the petitioners herein under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
B. The Parties to the Suit:
2. The first respondent/plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.24 of 2021. In the said suit, Ponni Delta Retirement Community, which is a Society of apartment owners registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and bearing Registration No.104/16, represented by its Secretary, who is arrayed as a first defendant. The defendants 2 to 4 are its other Office bearers. The fifth defendant is the Company, which was the builder and promoter of the said apartment complex. The defen
Booz Allen and Hamilton Insurance Company Vs. State Bank of India House Finance Limited
Vidya Drolia and Others Vs. Durga Trading Corporation
Suganya Holding Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Jayesh H.Pandya and another
Perkins Eastman Architects DPC and another Vs. HSCC (India) Ltd.
The court ruled that disputes involving non-signatory parties to an arbitration agreement cannot be referred to arbitration, maintaining the requirement for a judicial forum when serious allegations ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory requirement for the civil court to refer the parties to arbitration upon satisfaction of the prerequisites under Section 8 of the Arb....
Arbitral Tribunal is competent to decide on its own competence – Plea of fraud must be serious in nature in order to oust jurisdiction of Arbitrator.
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the legislative intent to promote arbitration, the limited power of prima facie review at the reference stage, and the rejection of the Law Com....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's interpretation of the arbitration clauses in the agreements and the application of Section 8 of the arbitration act to refer the disput....
Rejection of plaint – When a statute prescribes to do certain thing in a certain manner, the thing has to be done in same manner or not at all – All other modes are expressly forbidden.
The court emphasized strict adherence to procedural requirements for references to arbitration under the Arbitration Act, dismissing applications that do not explicitly comply.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.