N.V.RAMANA, SANJIV KHANNA, KRISHNA MURARI
Vidya Drolia – Appellant
Versus
Durga Trading Corporation – Respondent
Suggested Argument: Fraud Allegations Do Not Automatically Exclude Arbitration
Your Honor, mere allegations of fraud raised by the opposing party do not render the dispute non-arbitrable or invalidate the arbitration agreement. (!) A simple plea of fraud is insufficient; it must rise to the level of a virtual criminal offense, involve complex issues requiring voluminous evidence in a civil court, include serious forgery or fabrication of documents, target the arbitration provision itself, or permeate the entire contract such that the arbitration agreement is void. (!) Absent such exceptional circumstances, the dispute remains arbitrable, and the tribunal is competent to adjudicate. [1000735580046]
Even serious fraud claims must be tested against specific criteria: whether the plea undermines the entire contract and arbitration agreement, rendering it void ab initio, or merely concerns internal disputes between parties without broader public implications. (!) (!) Distinguish between fraud inducing the contract (potentially void under contract law principles) and post-formation fraud, which does not vitiate the agreement. (!)
The tribunal, like a court, is bound by public policy and mandatory law, ensuring robust resolution without preempting arbitration. [1000735580040] At this prima facie stage, absent clear evidence vitiating the arbitration clause itself, refer the matter to arbitration to uphold party autonomy and efficiency. (!) [1000735580046]
JUDGMENT :
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
This judgment decides the reference to three Judges made vide order dated 28th February, 2019 in Civil Appeal No. 2402 of 2019 titled Vidya Drolia and Others v. Durga Trading Corporation, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 358, as it doubts the legal ratio expressed in Himangni Enterprises v. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia, (2017) 10 SCC 706 that landlord-tenant disputes governed by the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, are not arbitrable as this would be contrary to public policy.
2. A deeper consideration of the order of reference reveals that the issues required to be answered relate to two aspects that are distinct and yet interconnected, namely:
(i) meaning of non-arbitrability and when the subject matter of the dispute is not capable of being resolved through arbitration; and
(ii) the conundrum – “who decides” – whether the court at the reference stage or the arbitral tribunal in the arbitration proceedings would decide the question of non-arbitrability.
The second aspect also relates to the scope and ambit of jurisdiction of the court at the referr
Himangni Enterprises v. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia
Natraj Studios (P) Ltd. v. Navrang Studios
Booz Allen & Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Ltd.4 In Natraj Studios (P) Ltd.
Duro Felguera, S.A v. Gangavaram Port Limited
Olympus Superstructures Pvt. Ltd. v. Meena Vijay Khetan and Others
Vimal Kishor Shah and Others v. Jayesh Dinesh Shah and Other
Dhulabhai Etc. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Another
Emaar MGF Land Limited v. Aftab Singh
Sukanya Holdings (P) Ltd. v. Jayesh H. Pandya and Another
SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering Ltd. and another
Chloro Controls India Private Limited v. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc. and Others
A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam and Others
Premier Automobiles Ltd. v. Kamlekar Shantaram Wadke of Bombay and Others
V.H. Patel & Company and Others v. Hirubhai Himabhai Patel and Others
Common Cause v. Union of India
Agricultural Produce Market Committee v. Ashok Harikuni & Another
Transcore v. Union of India and another
M.D. Frozen Foods Exports Private Limited and Others v. Hero Fincorp Limited
Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited v. Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited and Others
HDFC Bank Ltd. v. Satpal Singh Bakshi
N. Radhakrishnan v. Maestro Engineers and Others
Abdul Kadir Samshuddin Bubere v. Madhav Prabharkar Oak and Another
Union of India v. Singh Builders Syndicate
Konkan Railway Corpn. Ltd. and Others v. Mehul Construction Co.
Konkan Railway Construction Ltd. and Another v. Rani Construction Pvt. Ltd.
National Insurance Company Limited v. Boghara Polyfab Private Limited
Arasmeta Captive Power Company Private Limited and Another v. Lafarge India Private Limited
Shree Ram Mills Ltd. v. Utility Premises (P) Ltd.
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Aksh Optifibre Ltd. and Another
Mayavati Trading Private Limited v. Pradyuat Deb Burman
Filli Shipping Co. Limited v. Premium Nafta Products Ltd.
Garware Wall Ropes Limited v. Coastal Marine Constructions and Engineering Limited
Enercon (India) Ltd. v. Enercon GmbH
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Hyundai Engg. & Construction Co. Ltd.
Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Narbheram Power and Steel Private Limited
Vulcan Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Maharaj Singh and Another
Vulcan Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Maharaj Singh and Another
Damodar Valley Corporation v. K.K. Kar
Union of India v. Kishorilal Gupta & Bros.
Nirmala J. Jhala v. State of Gujarat and Another
Dell Computer Corporation v. Union des consommateurs and Olivier Dumoulin, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801
Subrata Roy Sahara v. Union of India
M.R. Engineers and Contractors Private Limited v. Som Datt Builders Limited
Himangni Enterprises v. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia
Mayavati Trading Pvt. Ltd. v. Pradyuat Deb Burman
ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Sidco Leathers Ltd.
Konkan Railway Corpn. Ltd. v. Mehul Construction Co.
Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. v. Rani Construction (P.) Ltd.
SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering Ltd.
ShinEtsu Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Aksh Optifibre Ltd.
Shree Ram Mills Ltd. v. Utility Premises (P) Ltd.
National Insurance Company Limited v. Boghara Polyfab Private 202 Limited
Chloro Controls India Private Ltd. v. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc.
Arasmeta Captive Power Company Private Limited v. Lafarge India Pvt. Ltd.
Duro Felguera, S.A. v. Gangavaram Port
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Narbheram Power and Steel Private Limited
Vulcan Insurance v. Maharaj Singh
Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Ltd.
Emaar MGF Land Limited v. Aftab Singh
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Genus Power Infrastructure Ltd.
Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Construction and Engineering Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.