SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2598

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Gunasekaran – Appellant
Versus
Saraswathy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.M.P.Senthil
For the Respondent: Mr.M.Karthick

ORDER :

K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.

This Civil Revision Petition is preferred against the order, dated22.02.2024 passed in I.A.No.82 of 2022 in O.S.No.19 of 2019 on the file of the Additional District, Paramakudi, dated 22.02.2024.

2. The revision petitioners are the defendants 4 and 5 in the above said suit. The respondent as plaintiff filed the said suit in O.S.No.19 of 2019 on the file of the Additional District, Paramakudi for partition and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from encumbering the suit property. Pending suit, the revision petitioners/defendants filed an application in I.A.No.82 of 2022 for marking a release deed, dated 28.07.1992 after paying the stamp duty required. The said document was resisted on the side of the respondent/plaintiff stating that the said document requires compulsory registration and stamp duty. The trial Court considering the averments made in the petition and counter affidavit and the arguments advanced by the respective counsels dismissed the said application. Aggrieved by the same the present revision is preferred.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners would submit that the respondent/plaintiff fil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top