H. P. SANDESH
Syed Humayun – Appellant
Versus
S. G. Jayagopal – Respondent
ORDER :
This revision petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court in H.R.C.No.16/2008 dated 01.10.2013 allowing the petition filed under Section 27(2), (a) and (r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 directing the petitioner herein to quit and vacate the premises within one month from the date of the order and also directed to pay Rs.41,000/-computing the rent at the rate of Rs.1,000/-per month from 17.07.2007 to 17.11.2007 and the rents accrued thereafter within one month from the date of the order. The revision petitioner has also challenged the order of dismissal passed by the Rent Revision Court in R.R.No.69/2013 dated 30.09.2015 confirming the order of the Trial Court granting 90 days time to vacate the premises from the date of the said order.
2. The factual matrix of the case of the respondent-landlord before the Trial Court is that he had purchased the petition schedule premises from previous owner Smt. Rani Balu G. At the time of purchase, the respondent therein was residing in the petition schedule premises as tenant. After purchase, the vendor of the petitioner issued the letter of attornement dated 09.12.2004 and since then, the respondent is continuing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.