Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, C.KUMARAPPAN
NEPC India Ltd. Rep. by its Director – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary to the Government – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed against land ceiling order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. application for exemption during rejection of land sales. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding exemption claim and its consideration. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. details of land ownership and violations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. interpretation of land ceiling act's purpose and implications. (Para 12 , 13 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. addresses statutory foundations regarding land ceiling and necessity of government permissions. (Para 14) |
| 7. deemed transfer of land violates legal provisions. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. supreme court's views on statutory provisions. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 9. invalidation of sales due to lack of permission. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 10. court's decision and dismissal of the writ. (Para 28) |
JUDGEMENT :
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
1. The unsuccessful writ petitioner before the writ Court is the appellant in the Writ Appeal No.1821 of 2011. The appellant instituted another W.P.No.15230 of 2002, challenging the Government Order issued in G.O.Ms.No.595 Revenue, dated 08.12.1998, and the Letter (Permanent) No.497 Revenue (L.Ref II) dated 12.11.2001 passed by the Government of Tamil Nadu and to direct the Government to grant permission to hol
Mandatory government permission is required for holding and transferring land in excess of ceiling limits under the Land Ceiling Act, with unauthorized sales deemed invalid.
Industrial undertakings cannot hold or alienate land beyond statutory ceiling without government permission under Section 37-A; statutory law overrides conflicting government letters and illegal poss....
Prescribed Authority and the Appellate Court did not have valid or sufficient grounds for rejecting the revised choice indicated by the petitioner because the choice can be revised till such time his....
The court emphasized that a transfer made during a life interest is void under the Land Ceiling Act, but substantive rights under the Transfer of Property Act remain intact, necessitating a civil sui....
The court affirmed that transfers made to evade land ceiling laws are void under Section 22, emphasizing the importance of timely action by affected parties.
The court held that valid sale deeds executed before the appointed date under the Ceiling Act must be considered, and notices issued post-death of the tenure holder are invalid.
The court upheld the validity of the allotment of excess land, ruling that failure to follow proper procedure under the Urban Land Ceiling Act did not negate the State's possession rights.
Exemption orders under Section 20(1) of the Urban Land Ceiling Act remain valid post-repeal if no violation of conditions occurs, rendering withdrawal attempts unlawful.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
