Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, K.RAJASEKAR
Regina Jeyapaul – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer, Special Deputy Collector (Revenue Court) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. RAJASEKAR, J.
This intra-Court appeal is filed by the writ petitioner challenging the order passed in W.P.(MD).No.1849 of 2010 dated 29.04.2014, wherein, the Writ Court has confirmed the order passed by the Appellate Authority confirming the order of registration of Respondent No.4 as Cultivating Tenant, under the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Lands Record of Tenancy Rights Act, 1969, in A.P.No.2 of 2009 dated 18.12.2009.
2. The brief facts leading to filing of this appeal are as follows:
The lands in Survey No.174, 173/1B measuring 2 Acres and 44 Cents in Thallakulam Village, Madurai North, belong to Sooraveli Subbier Trust. These lands were equally divided into two portions and one portion of subject property in this proceedings was in possession of one Gnanam @ Gnanambal, W/o.Vedamuthu as a cultivating tenant. After her death, one Abraham, as one of the legal heirs of the said Gnanam @ Gnanambal, started cultivating and his name was also recorded under the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Lands Record of Tenancy Rights Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as 'Record of Tenancy Rights Act'). Subsequently, the writ petitioner has entered into an agreement with the said Abraham and her na
The Appellate Authority's decisions based on presumed fraud, without substantial evidence, are unsustainable; prior tenancy records must be challenged through established procedures.
Cultivating tenancies under Tamil Nadu law are not transferable, and a tenant must contribute physical labor to qualify as a statutory tenant.
The judgment established the power of Civil Courts to decide the validity of entries made under Act 10 of 1969 and the requirement for genuine entries as per the law.
The court affirmed the necessity of a fair hearing and reasoned decisions by authorities in tenancy disputes.
Lawful cultivation establishes deemed tenancy status under the Maharashtra Tenancy Act, irrespective of documentary evidence like rent receipts.
The court affirmed that the protected tenant's rights under the Tenancy Act cannot be overridden by private agreements or settlements that do not comply with statutory requirements.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
