IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B.BALAJI
M.Govindarajan – Appellant
Versus
Soodamani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion surrounding the amendment application and its context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. examination of case laws and their applicability regarding amendments. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. conclusion on the rights accrued and issue of limitations. (Para 21 , 23 , 24) |
ORDER
The plaintiff, aggrieved by the order of dismissal of an application for amendment of the plaint, has come up by way of the present revision petition.
2.I have heard Mr.P.Valliappan, learned Senior Counsel for M/s.P.V.Law Associates for the petitioner/plaintiff and Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned Senior Counsel for Mrs.V.Srimathi, learned counsel for the respondents/defendants.
3.Mr.P.Valliappan, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the suit is one for partition of the suit property and claiming 1/5 share in the same. He would further submit that in the written statement, the defendants had contended that the father had executed a registered settlement deed as early as on 16.07.2013 in favour of the 3rd respondent herein. According to the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, the said settlement deed is a fabricated document having been brought about by fraud and coercion and
Muthusamy and Others Vs. Loganathan and Others
Gajanan Jaikishan Joshi Vs. Prabhakar Mohanlal Kalwar
South Konkan Distilleries and Another Vs. Prabhakar Gajanan Naik and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.