Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. SATHISH KUMAR
Sundarammal – Appellant
Versus
Kanagaraj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to execution court's order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. limitation period for setting aside ex parte orders. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. divergent judicial opinions on condonation of delay. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. arguments regarding amendments and their implications. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. historical context of amendments to cpc. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 6. court's directive on future procedural amendments. (Para 51 , 52) |
| 7. setting aside of the execution court's orders. (Para 53) |
COMMON ORDER :
Challenging the order of the Execution Court allowing the application under Order 21 Rule 106(3) CPC by condoning the delay of 31 days, the present revision petitions have been filed.
2.The suit in O.S.No.158 of 2007 has been originally filed by the petitioners for declaration; consequential permanent injunction and for other reliefs. The suit was decreed in part on 27.01.2011. The decree holders filed Execution Petition in E.P.No.5 of 2022 to enforce the decree. Defendants/Judgment Debtors 11 and 21, the respondents herei
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
