SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 4932

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.Suresh Kumar, A.D.Maria Clete, JJ.
R.Ramesh - Appellant
Versus
V.Praneshwaran and ors. - Respondents
C.M.A.No.2672 of 2024
Decided On : 03-02-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.S.Kalyanaraman
For the Respondent: Mr.C.R.Krishnamurthy

The court ruled that actual income based on Income Tax Returns must be considered for compensation calculations, rejecting arbitrary figures set by the Tribunal.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Compensation for injuries - Claimant sought enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal - Tribunal initially awarded Rs.19,11,000/- based on a monthly income of Rs.16,000/- - Court found the monthly income should be Rs.40,000/- based on Income Tax Returns for 2019-20 and 2020-21 - Compensation under 'Permanent Disability and Loss of Earning Power' modified to Rs.34,32,000/- - Total compensation enhanced to Rs.39,70,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum. (Paras 4, 12, 13)

(B) Appeal - Scope of enhancement - Court emphasized the need to consider actual income based on tax returns rather than arbitrary figures set by the Tribunal. (Paras 9, 10)

Table of Content
1. income tax returns as basis (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
2. compensation enhanced (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT :

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Subordinate Judge, Erode in M.C.O.P.No.153 of 2021 dated 29.11.2023.

2. In view of the order that is going to be passed, notice to the respondents 1 and 2 is hereby dispensed with.

3. Due to the motor vehicle accident that took place on 10.01.2021, the appellant / claimant was injured and he had taken treatment as in-patient for 38 days. He was assessed to have suffered 55% disability by the Medical Board. Based on this disability that he suffered due to the accident, the claimant / appellant, who is an Advocate by profession, filed MCOP No.153 of 2023 before the Tribunal.

4. The learned Tribunal, having taken the functional disability at 100%, applied the correct multiplier, but had taken the monthly earning only at the rate of Rs.16,000/-, based on which the following award has been passed.

“As per the dictum in 2018 (1) TN MAC 731 (SC) ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., -vs- Ajay Kumar Mohanty and another” , the petitioner is entitled for loss of earning as granted above.

HeadingsAmount in Rs.
1) Loss of EarningsNIL
2) Transport to Hospital10,000
3) Extra Nourishment15,000
4) Attender Charges15,000
5) Future Medical Expenses1,50,000
6) Damages for Clothes and Articles5,000
7) Medical Expenses2,43,000
8) Pain and Sufferings1,00,000
9) Permanent Disability and Loss of earning power13,73,000
Total19,11,000

13) a) In the result, this petition in MCOP No.153/2021 is allowed in part with proportionate cost and the petitioner is awarded compensation for a sum of Rs.19,11,000/- (Rupees Nineteen Lakhs and Eleven Thousand Only) together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum (Interest less future medical expenses Rs.1,50,000/-) from the date of the petition till the notice of deposit given to the petitioner, payable by the 3rd respondent on behalf of the 2nd respondent.

b) The petitioner is not entitled for any interest for the period of default if any.

c) The 3rd respondent is hereby directed to deposit the award amount to the credit of the “MACT' Special Subordinate Judge, which is the Bank Account of this Claims Tribunal specially being maintained for this purpose at State Bank of India Town Branch, Erode – 638 011, Account No.35981547810 and IFSC Code – SBIN0007897 directly by NEFT (or) RTGS mode.

5. In the said award, under the head “Permanent Disability and Loss of Earning Power” only a sum of Rs.13,73,000/- has been awarded. Aggrieved over the same, the appellant / claimant has filed the present appeal seeking for enhancement.

6. Heard Mr.S.Kalyanaraman, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.C.R.Krishnamoorthy for the third respondent.

7. The only area where enhancement is sought for by the appellant is with regard to the monthly income that has been fixed at Rs.16,000/- by the Tribunal through the impugned award, whereas the appellant being an Advocate has filed Income Tax Returns regularly and for the purpose of calculation of compensation, we have taken the Income Tax Returns filed by the appellant/claimant for the Assessment Years 2019-20 and 2020-21.

8. For the Assessment Year 2019-20, the gross total income of the appellant/claimant was Rs.3,53,011 and after deductions, the net taxable income was fixed at Rs.2,32,230/-. Insofar as the Assessment Year 2020-21 is concerned, the gross total income was fixed at Rs.6,13,147/- and after deductions, the taxable net income was fixed at Rs.4,97,789/-.

9. If this is the Income Tax Assessment for the two immediate preceding years of the date of the accident, which occurred on 10.01.2021, the Tribunal ought to have taken these Income Tax Returns into consideration. Thereby, the immediate preceding year's net income since was fixed at Rs.4,97,798/- which is around Rs.40,000/- per month, and hence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top