Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Muthukumar – Appellant
Versus
Joint Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Madurai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding temple trusteeship (Para 2) |
| 2. legal provisions for inquiries under the act (Para 3) |
| 3. delegation of powers and limitations (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. finding on the validity of the inspector's report (Para 6) |
| 5. conclusion and directive for a new inquiry (Para 8) |
ORDER :
1. The present writ petition is filed praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent viz., The Inspector, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Srivilliputhur to submit a report afresh before the 1st respondent i.e., The Joint Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Madurai by conducting an inquiry as contemplated under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act 22/1959 (in short "the Act"), in respect of O.A.No.30/2023.
2. Brief Facts
2.1. The petitioner is a trustee of Arulmighu Thangavinayagar Temple, Vathrayapu, Virudhunagar District. The said Temple was consecrated in the early 1900's by Adhinarayana Pillai and Chinnasamy Pillai, children of Gurusamy Pillai. Both of whom did not have any male children. In terms of the will of the founder of the Temple, the T
The Joint Commissioner must conduct inquiries under Section 63(b) of the Act, as delegation of this duty to the Inspector is invalid, affirming that statutory roles cannot be delegated without explic....
The judicial inquiry under Section 63 of the Tamil Nadu HR&CE Act must be conducted by the Joint Commissioner, as the power to delegate this authority is not granted, ensuring legal compliance and du....
The Inspector lacks authority to conduct an enquiry under Section 64(1) of the Act, which mandates that only the Joint Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner can settle schemes after proper consultation....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Assistant Commissioner does not have the power to declare an institution as a religious institution and appoint a fit person under Section....
The appointment of non-hereditary trustees is valid under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act when there is evidence of mismanagement by hereditary trustees, and full legal procedures a....
Point of Law : Exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not barred merely because there is an alternative remedy of appeal.
The Commissioner lacked authority to appoint an Executive Officer for temple administration, violating established law and trustee rights under the HR & CE Act.
The court ruled that the Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act does not permit the formation of a committee to oversee the actions of a hereditary trustee.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
