Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Purvam Satyanarayana, S/o. Late Pentaiah – Appellant
Versus
Nandyala Rama Krishna Reddy, S/o. Late Yella Reddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.
1. The appellant/plaintiff has filed the Appeal Suit against an order dated 14.07.2025 passed by the learned III Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B. Nagar, in I.A.No.772 of 2022 in O.S.No.1064 of 2022, filed by the respondent No.1/defendant No.1 in the plaintiff’s Suit.
2. The plaintiff filed the Suit in O.S.No.1064 of 2022 for declaration of ownership, perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction and for a declaration that the registered General Power of Attorney bearing document No.45/2006 dated 01.06.2006, registered Sale Deed bearing document No.4938/2008 dated 25.11.2008 and registered Sale Deed bearing document No.25283/2015 dated 09.12.2015 are sham, null and void and not binding on the plaintiff, along with rectification of revenue records and rectification of boundaries.
3. The respondent No.1/defendant No.1 filed I.A.No.772 of 2022 in O.S.No.1064 of 2022 for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a) and 11(d) of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) on the grounds that the plaint did not disclose a cause of action and was barred by the law of limitation.
4. By the impugned order dated 14.07.2025, the Trial Co
A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 for non-disclosure of cause of action and being barred by limitation if claims are based on prior known events.
(1) Rejection of plaint – When a document referred to in plaint, forms basis of plaint, it should be treated as a part of plaint – Court cannot look into written statement or documents filed by defen....
A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 if it is barred by limitation or fails to disclose a cause of action, emphasizing the necessity for clear and truthful averments.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a meaningful reading of the plaint, scrutiny of the cause of action, and prevention of illusory causes of action to avoid circumventin....
The court ruled that the plaintiff's suit was timely as she only discovered the fraudulent sale deed in October 2023, emphasizing that limitation is a mixed question of fact and law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
