SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 5168

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R.Suresh Kumar, G.Arul Murugan, JJ.
The District Collector District Collector Office and ors. - Appellants
Versus
P.Naveen Kumar and ors. – Respondents
W.A.(MD).Nos.986 and 1261 of 2024 and C.M.P.(MD).Nos.7164 and 9737 of 2024 and C.M.P.(MD).Nos.8019 and 8520 of 2024
Decided On : 13-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.N.R.Elango Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, Govt. Pleader Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.Vanchinathan
For the Respondent: Mr.G.Rajagopalan, Senior Counsel, Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu, Mr.Dama Seshadri Naidu, Senior Counsel, Mr.K.P.S.Palanivel Rajan, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.Madhavan, Mr.K.Suresh, Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, Govt. Pleader, Mr.R.Narayanan, Mr.T.Senthil Kumar, APP

Religious practices are subject to constitutional morality and must not infringe on human dignity or public health, reaffirming the binding nature of higher court judgments.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 25, and 26 - Religious practice - Writ petition allowing rolling over on plantain leaves after meal prohibited by a previous Division Bench Judgment. This constituted violation of human dignity and public morality, aligning with earlier established principles regarding protection of fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 - Writ Court's order declared a nullity since Division Bench Judgment was binding and not subject to unilateral dismissal. (Paras 6, 28, 66)

Facts of the case:
Naveen Kumar filed a writ petition seeking permission for Annadhanam and Angapradakshinam during a religious festival, asserting no caste discrimination in the practice and that previous restrictions were based on misrepresentation. The event had been conducted uninterrupted until 2015 when prior court orders prohibited the rolling over practice, associated with human dignity concerns. (Paras 2.1, 2.4, 4, 5, 60)

Findings of Court:
The earlier Division Bench judgment from 2015 is binding, prohibiting the practice based on concerns surrounding dignity and health, reinforced by current Supreme Court rulings. (Paras 66.1, 66.4, 66.3)

Issues: Whether the writ court could entertain a petition against an existing ban established by a higher forum and whether the rolling over practice was essential to the relevant religious denomination. (Paras 5, 66.2)

Ratio Decidendi: The Divisional Bench's ruling must be adhered to; without evidence of health hazards associated with the ritual, the arguments concerning public morality and constitutional rights dictate that the state cannot allow this traditional practice to continue, as constitutional morality prevails. (Paras 66.2, 66.4)

Result: Writ court's order set aside; practice of rolling over plantain leaves remains prohibited. (Para 67)

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 2)
2. arguments presented by the appellants and respondents. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 8 , 10 , 11)
3. court's observations on the religious practice. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 21 , 24 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 42 , 56)
4. principles regarding the prohibition of the practice. (Para 36 , 66)
5. final ruling on the case. (Para 67)

JUDGMENT :

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

Both the writ appeals have been filed challenging the order dated 17.05.2024 made in W.P.(MD).No.10496 of 2024. Both these writ appeals were heard together and are disposed of by this common order.

2. The necessary facts which are required to be noticed for the disposal of these appeals are as follows :

2.1. That one P.Naveen Kumar, S/o. Pitchai Muthu filed a writ petition, i.e., W.P.(MD).No.10496 of 2024, who is the first respondent in these appeals, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents therein, i.e. Respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of him dated 22.04.2024 and grant permission to conduct Annadhanam and Angapradakshinam, i.e., rolling over the plantain leaves left by the devotees after the Annadhanam on 18.05.2024, i.e., on the eve of Jeeva Samadhi day of Sri Sadhasiva Brahmendral situate at Nerur Village, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District.

2.2. The cause of action for filing the said writ petition, according to the first respondent Naveen Kumar as has been averred in the affidavit filed in support of the said writ petition, is that at the village Nerur in Karur District, there is a Sabha called Nerur Sathguru Sadhasiva Brahmendra Sabha. The first respondent / writ petitioner and others are strong devotees of Sri Sadhasiva Brahmendral. The Sabha is located nearby the place where the Sadhasiva Brahmendral has attained Jeeva Samadhi. The fourth respondent therein Sabha was organising the Annadhanam festival during the Jeeva Samadhi day.

2.3. As per the prevailing religious custom and practice, the Annadhanam food will be prepared and offered Neivedhiyam to Sri Sadhasiva Brahmendral, then the annadhanam food will be distributed to all the devotees irrespective of any caste and religion. After the annadhanam, the plantain leaves used by the devotees are left on the floor. Thereafter the devotees who want to offer their Nerthikadan will roll over the said plantain leaves. There is a strong belief behind this religious custom that Sri Sadhasiva Brahmendral himself will eat the annadhanam along with the devotees and rolling over such plantain leaves believed to be used by Sri Sadhasiva Brahmendral will be a blessing for the devotees.

2.4. It was the further case of the said Naveen Kumar, the first respondent herein that, the Annadhanam event will be held during the Tamil month Vaigasi and on the day of Sukhla Dhasami Thithi. Until 2015, the said religious custom was performed uninterruptedly, however during the year 2015, the District Administration has declined to permit the said Annadhanam by referring to an order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No. 7068 of 2015. Due to the non co-operation of the Sabha, the villagers could not pursue the matters closely in the subsequent years.

2.5. It is the further case of the said Naveen Kumar that, now the villagers and devotees together want to perform the Annadhanam on the eve of the Jeeva Samadhi day as many devotees were not able to offer the Nerthikadan for the last few years. Upon perusing the order passed in W.P. (MD).No.7068 of 2015, it revealed that the order has been passed on misrepresentation that one section of people belongs to particular community will roll over in the plantain leaves left by the other community people after partaking Annadhanam, but that is not correct.

2.6. It is the further case of the said Naveen Kumar, the first respondent herein that, there has been no caste discrimination in practising the said religious custom and the devotees in consultation with the Sabha and villagers had scheduled to conduct Annadhanam on 18.05.2024, therefore seeking pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top