SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3426

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.S.Sundar, C.Kumarappan, JJ.
N.Dharmalingam - Appellant
Versus
N.Ayyavoo [Died] and ors. – Respondent
AS.No.643 of 2008 & CRP.No.1962 of 2013
Decided On : 14-12-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.A.K.Sriram, Senior Counsel for Mr.D.Balachandran
For the Respondent: Mr.G.Masilamani Senior Counsel for Mr.T.Sathiyamoorthy

In a partition suit, properties individually acquired cannot be presumed as joint family properties unless evidence proves acquisition occurred through joint family funds, emphasizing the necessity of strict adherence to evidentiary standards under Hindu law.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Partition Suit - Appellant claims 1/3rd share in joint family properties, which include properties from deceased parents - Suit dismissed by Trial Court for non-joinder of necessary parties and lack of evidence showing properties as joint family - Appeal considered whether the properties are joint family properties or self-acquired - Court affirms principles of Hindu Law that lacks presumption of joint family properties unless evidence of joint family funds used for acquisition - Court found that properties individually purchased cannot be deemed joint family; the plaintiff entitled to specific shares in certain items, while others were held as separate properties of the defendants. (Paras 1-74)

(B) Joint Family Property - Principles regarding acquisition and character of properties under Hindu Law at stake; need for evidentiary base for joint claims - Burden of proof lies on party asserting that properties are joint family properties. (Paras 20-29, 48, 49)

Table of Content
1. factual background of the family and properties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. defendants' response and claims against the plaintiff. (Para 7 , 11)
3. trial court's examination of evidence and testimonies. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. key issues framed by the court and arguments highlighted. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 19)
5. court's legal analysis of joint family property principles. (Para 15 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
6. precedents affirming the burden of proof concerning property ownership. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 38 , 40)
7. court's final conclusions and rulings on property entitlements. (Para 56 , 58 , 62 , 63)

JUDGMENT :

S.S. SUNDAR, J.

(1) The plaintiff in the suit in OS.No.17/2006 on the file of Additional District Court-cum-Fast Track Court No.1, Erode, is the appellant in the above Appeal. The suit is for partition of plaintiff's 1/3rd share in all the suit properties which are described as Items No.1 to 14.

(2) Respondents 1 to 12 are defendants 1 to 12 in the suit in OS.No.17/2006. The appellant and respondents, who are plaintiff and defendants, are close relatives. The appellant who is the plaintiff, is the son of one Thiru.Nanjappa Mudaliyar who died in the year 1952. The 1st defendant is none else than the brother of the appellant herein. The 6th defendant is the wife of 1st defendant. Thiru.Nanjappa Mudaliyar had two wives. Through the first wife Chinnammal, he had a son by name Nachimuthu, who died on 06.07.2000. Wife of Thiru.Nachimuthu, Mrs.Parvatham, died even earlier on 02.04.1993. Thiru.Nanjappa Mudailyar had three more daughters through his first wife Smt.Chinnammal. Admittedly, Chinnammal, the first wife died long back and after her life time, Thiru.Nanjappa Mudaliyar married second wife. The daughters of Thiru.Nanjappa Mudaliyar, through first wife had no right or claim in the properties of Thiru.Nanjappa Mudaliyar. Therefore, they were not impleaded as parties in the suit. The 2nd wife of Thiru.Nanjappa Mudaliyar is Smt.Seerangayammal died on 22.03.1991. Through the 2nd wife Thiru.Nanjappa Mudaliyar had three sons by name Tvl.Sadasivam, Iyyavu and Dharmalingam and two daughters by name Pappathi @ Sarojini and Chandra, who is the 12th defendant in the suit. Thiru.Sadasivam died on 04.12.1983 and he had one son by name Mohanasundaram and three daughters by name Jayanthi, Santhi and Kalaivani. The son and daugthers of Thiru.Sadasivam are impleaded as defendants 2 to 5. The wife of Thiru.Iyyavu by name Smt.Sampoornam is the 6th defendant in the suit. The sister of plaintiff and 1st defendant by name Pappathi @ Sarojini died on 27.09.2003 even before filing of suit and therefore, her son by name Murugesan is impleaded as 7th defendant. The 7th defendant also died on 22.04.2010 during pendency of the proceedings and therefore, his heirs were impleaded as defendants 8 to 11.

(3) The case of the plaintiff in the plaint is that his father Thiru.Nanjappa Mudaliyar purchased Item No.1 of the Suit Schedule properties out of his income from the business as he himself was a weaver. It is the further case of plaintiff that after the death of Thiru.Nanjappa Mudaliyar, his elder son Thiru.Nachimuthu [born through the 1st wife] took over the business and he was acting as a Manager of the joint family. From out of the joint family income Thiru.Nachimuthu started a business in textiles along with one Thambanna Mudaliyar and Nachimuthu. It is his case that Nachimuthu was carrying on the said business in his capacity as a joint family Manager. It is also stated that after the retirement of Thambanna Mudaliyar, the other partner in the business, Thiru.Nachimuthu, took over the entier business. It is the case of plaintiff that female members of the family were made as members of Erode Weavers Cooperative Society. Item No.2 in the suit schedule properties was allotted in the name of mother of plaintiff and 1st defendant, namely, Seerangayammal and the property in Item No.3 was allotted in the name of Parvatham, wife of Thiru.Nachi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top