Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
New India Assurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Joint Commissioner of Labour/Employees' Compensation Commissioner, Combined Labour Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim under workmen's compensation act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's consideration of arguments (Para 3) |
| 3. duty to notify third parties under rule 39 (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. writ petition allowed, no costs (Para 6) |
ORDER :
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.
In spite of service of notice on Respondent No.2, no appearance is entered and Respondent No.3 refused to receive the notice. In the circumstances, this Court has no option except to dispose of the matter basing on the material available on record.
2. This is a case where Respondent No.2 herein made a claim against Respondent No.3 and the petitioner herein before Respondent No.1 under the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 for the injury suffered by him. In the said proceedings, the petitioner herein, by way of filing a counter affidavit, brought to the notice of Respondent No.1 that the owner of the third party vehicle is liable for the injury caused to Respondent No.2 and therefore, the owner of the said third party vehicle viz., the lorry bearing Registration No.TN47 BX 3721 and the insurer of the said vehicle are also liable. However, in spite of the same, Respondent No.1 failed to take any action under Rule 39 of th
The court emphasized the mandatory issuance of notice to third parties in indemnification claims under the Workmen's Compensation Act, ensuring procedural compliance for fair resolution of claims.
Under the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Commissioner must notify third parties claimed to be liable for indemnification to ensure fair proceedings and avoid delays.
The liability of the insurance company under the Workmen’s Compensation Act is contingent on the payment of additional premium for covering the risk of the labourers, and the provisions of the Motor ....
The Workmen's Compensation Act confers an absolute liability on employers to compensate injured workmen, allowing for indemnification from third parties responsible for injuries.
An insurer's liability excludes interest and penalties if the insurance policy explicitly states such exclusions, as determined under commercial contract principles.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and applicability of the insurance policy under Sec. 146 and Sec. 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing the coverage of ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Insurance Company is primarily liable to pay compensation to the workmen under the Workmen Compensation Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
