SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 78010

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R.N.MANJULA, J.
D.Mathavan - Petitioner
Versus 
The Chairman cum Managing Director ,Tamil Nadu Electricity Board - Respondent
W.P.(MD).No.16134 of 2023
Decided On : 21-06-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms.G.Vidhya Maheswaran
For the Respondent: Mr.B.Ramanathan, Standing Counsel

Applications for compassionate appointments by guardians on behalf of minors must be recognized and deemed valid if submitted within the established time limits.

Headnote:(A) Compassionate Appointment Scheme - Writ of Mandamus - The petitioner's application for compassionate appointment was rejected based solely on the timing of submission and the petitioner’s minority at the time of his father's death. The court emphasized that the initial application made by the petitioner's mother, being within the three-year limit, is deemed valid. Recent government guidelines indicate no age limit for application submission, although the applicant must be 18 for appointment. (Paras 7, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner’s father, a Mazdoor, died while in service. The petitioner and sister were minors during the application process initiated by their mother. Respondents contended the application was outside the three-year limit.

Findings of Court:
The court held that the rejection of the application based solely on timing was erroneous as the initial application by the mother was submitted within the required timeframe.

Issues: The main issue was whether the application was timely despite the petitioner being a minor during initial submissions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that applications submitted by guardians for minors should be recognized, and age limits stipulated in the governing rules should not impede the consideration of earlier applications.

Result: Writ Petition allowed and the impugned order set aside.

Table of Content
1. compassionate appointment application process. (Para 2 , 3)
2. timeliness of application for compassionate appointment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9)
3. age requirements in compassionate appointment rules. (Para 7 , 8)
4. reconsideration of the petitioner's application. (Para 10)

ORDER :

R.N.MANJULA, J.

1. Heard Ms.G.Vidhya Maheswaran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.B.Ramanathan, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, seeking direction against the third respondent dated 02.05.2023 and consequently direct the respondents to give compassionate appointment in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board to the petitioner, according to his educational qualification.

3. Mr.G.Vidhyamaheswaran, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's father namely, A.Duraisamy, who was as Mazdoor in Tamil Nadu Electricity Board died in harness on 16.03.2008. At the time of death of the father, the petitioner was 7 years old and his sister was 9 years old. The petitioner's mother submitted applications on 08.02.2011, 08.03.2011, 28.09.2017 and 20.09.2022 seeking for compassionate appointment. Thereafter, the petitioner has also submitted the application to the respondents on 15.09.2022.

4. However, the impugned order dated 02.05.2023 has been passed by the third respondent, rejecting the application seeking appointment under compassionate scheme by stating that the application has not been filed within three years from the date of death of the deceased employee and at the time when the application was filed, the petitioner has not attained the age of 18 years.

5. The petitioner's father died on 16.03.2008 and the petitioner's mother had given the first application on 08.02.2011 within three years for seeking compassionate appointment for her son, the petitioner herein, who was a minor at that point of time. Obviously, the petitioner being a minor could not have given an application on his own and his mother as a guardian, had given the application on his behalf. Until the petitioner attained majority, no order has been passed on the application filed by the mother.

6. It might be possible that after attaining majority, the petitioner himself has give a representation to consider the earlier application. However, the respondents cannot consider that as the first application in order to count the period of limitation of three years. But, the date of application submitted by the petitioner's mother is well within the period of three years from the date of death of his father.

7. In the recent Government Order issued in G.O.(Ms).No.33, Labour Welfare and Skill Development (Q1) Department, dated 08.03.2023, it is stated that there shall be no minimum age limit for the applicant on the date of application for appointment. However, no appointment shall not be provided unless the applicant completes 18 years age. For the purpose of clarity, the above Rule is extracted as under:

“6. Age limit-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules governing the post for which appointment on compassionate grounds is to be made, on the date of application for appointment.

(a) the spouse of the deceased or medically invalidated Government Servant or the parent of the deceased Government servant, must not have completed fifty years of age; and (b)the son, daughter, brother or sister of the deceased or medically invalidated Government servant must not have completed forty years of age.

2) Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules governing the post for which appointment on compassionate grounds is to be made, there shall be no minimum age limit for the applicant on the date of application for appointment.

Provided that appointment shall not be provided unless the applicant completes eighteen years of age.”

8. Mr.B.Ramanatha, learned Standing Counsel, for the respondents, considered that the scheme for giving compassionate appointment by the respondents would be go

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top