Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, K.KUMARESH BABU
LSS OCEAN TRANSPORT DMCC – Appellant
Versus
K.I. (INTERNATIONAL) LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the appeal and its basis. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of the charterparty and claims for demurrage. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. arbitration proceedings and awards context. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. claims against group companies and legal arguments. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. appellant's arguments regarding corporate relationships. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. respondent's rebuttal and corporate independence. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. core issue and legal question outlined. (Para 37 , 38) |
| 9. contractual obligations and breaches discussed. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 10. security provisions and key judicial findings. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 11. involvement of 2nd respondent in security arrangement. (Para 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 12. arguments on corporate liability and guarantees. (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 13. rejections of technical defenses by the respondent. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 14. judicial conclusion on enforcing award against the 2nd respondent. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 15. complexities of group companies and enforcement of awards. (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66) |
| 16. |
Parties can enforce arbitration awards against group companies if such companies provide security, binding them to obligations even if not direct parties to previous agreements.
A court may refer parties to arbitration despite allegations of fraud, as long as the agreement is not prima facie null and void, and can modify security conditions based on arbitral findings.
The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is upheld unless specific procedural or public policy violations are proven, which was not established in ....
Court affirmed enforceability of foreign arbitral award despite objections on notice, establishing party's responsibility to engage in proceedings despite received communications.
The court reaffirmed that arbitration agreements are personal and must reflect established mutual intent, allowing for non-signatories to be bound depending on the factual context and the parties' re....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
